Urbanism Ain't Elitist
One of columnist Steve Berg's New Year's resolutions is to explain to how supporting urbanist ideas like using cars less and retrofitting suburbs come from sound principles and aren't based in elitism.
Berg writes:
"Urbanists are accused of wanting to take away people's cars and force them to live in tight quarters, but that's absurd. Urban-style living isn't for everyone. People should live where and how they want. What urbanists do favor, however, is a system of rules and prices that fairly reflect the costs of people's decisions."
"These don't seem like elitist or radical positions to me. They seem reasonable and downright conservative, even patriotic."
Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 in
- Throwing Some Cold Water on the 'Tiny Homes' Movement
- Portland's Long-Term Transportation Plans Include a Downtown Subway
- Mapping the Tools of Discrimination
- Is This Really Penn Station?
- The Affordable Rental Housing Crisis Is Only Getting Worse
- It's Too Hot to Fly in Phoenix Today
- What Happened When Arlington Cut Out the 'Missing Middle'
- Surveying the Suburban Office Market
- No Cars Allowed on Portland's New Street
- A Rap Song About Bike Safety? Yes Please.
- Developers Ready for New Opportunities Along the Chicago River
- Big Piece of Detroit's 'Inner Circle Greenway' Falls Into Place
- Friday Fun: A Mario Kart Tour of Japan
- In Memoriam: Branden Klayko, 'Broken Sidewalk' Blogger
- A Concerning Lack of Tribal Participation in Tacoma Tidelands Planning
- New Projects to House Homeless in San Jose
- Seoul and the Future of Transit
- Southern California City Pins Hopes for Transformation on General Plan Update
- Hot Off the Presses: Austin's Draft Street Design Guide
- State Supreme Court Deals Setback for Philly Casino Proposal
