Building Codes Should Not Be Privately Copyrighted
Public domain activist Carl Malamud explains in this brief talk why he believes building, fire and safety codes should be taken out of the hands of the private companies that distribute them and made publicly accessible.
Malamud says that just as the internet was able to create the expansive infrastructure it has today through open source data, so too open access to building codes and would inspire greater innovation.
Full Story:
Published on Monday, October 25, 2010 in
- New Tallest Building West of the Mississippi Now Open
- San Diego, Marin County Heading the Opposite Direction on Housing Policy
- Overcoming Density Opponents by Listening to Them
- Brewing Can Ferment Growth in Towns and Neighborhoods in Need of a Lift
- Urine Trouble: MARTA Station Elevators to Get Pee Alarms
- The New Apple Store in Chicago Looks a lot Like a Laptop
- Bike-Lash Erasing Baltimore's New Bike Infrastructure
- Los Angeles Councilmember Chooses the Side of Traffic Safety
- An Expanding Vision for San Francisco's Treasure Island
- Friday Fun: A Mario Kart Tour of Japan
- Who's Mapping Gentrification, and Where?
- Hosting a City Planning Minecraft Lounge for Kids
- Louisiana's Subsidence Problem Looks Dire
- Public-Private Partnerships: Cost-Effective or Cash Cow?
- Feds Change Course, Approve $15.5 Billion California Water Project
- Baltimore's Redesigned Bus System Rolls Out, With Wrinkles to Iron
- Subsidized Carpool Rides: There's an App for That
- Mapping Rooftop Solar to Make It a Social Norm
- McMansion Hell Blog in Legal Hot Water with Real Estate Site Zillow
- A Church Playground Controversy Grew Into a Supreme Court Decision
