A couple of weeks ago, I was on a bus in Chicago and noticed something that I had not noticed before- that how you paid to get on the bus affected how long you took to get on the bus. People who flashed monthly passes boarded in a few seconds. People who put in dollar bills got on a lot more slowly, as they fumbled for the right number of bills. People who had to pay change took longer still. So to speed buses’ on-time performance (pun intended) transit agencies should encourage the former and discourage the latter.
A couple of weeks ago, I was on a bus in Chicago and noticed
something that I had not noticed before- that how you paid to get on the bus
affected how long you took to get on the bus.
People who flashed monthly passes boarded in a few seconds. People who put in dollar bills got on a lot
more slowly, as they fumbled for the right number of bills. People who had to pay change took longer
still.
So to speed buses' on-time performance (pun intended)
transit agencies should encourage the former and discourage the latter.
How can this be done?
One way is to manipulate the fare structure to disfavor change-fumbling
and encourage faster modes of payment- and the national transit funding crisis
provides a perfect opportunity to do this.
Suppose a transit agency has lost 20% of its revenue due to the
recession. The typical transit agency
response is either to cut service (the worst possible option, as I have pointed
out elsewhere).* The second worst option is to raise fares just enough to cover
the deficit- a policy that reduces ridership of course, and does no affirmative
good.
But if the agency wants to make buses run faster, it can
combine fare increases with positive steps to encourage use of passes and/or
dollar bills. In particular, the transit
agency should raise fares to the next dollar increment, and use any surplus to
either increase service or reduce the price of weekly and monthly passes. Thus, riders would have to pay more, but at
least they'd be getting some positive benefit from their fare increase.
For example, suppose the Anycity Transit Agency (ATA)
currently charges $1.25 per ride, and needs to raise fares to make up for lost
government support. The unimaginative
but common decision would be to raise fares to $1.75 (and/or cut service). In no way does this decision leave riders
better off; they have to pay more and fumble for even more quarters than
usual.
Instead, ATA should raise fares to $2. Even after accounting for revenue lost due to
lower ridership, ATA is left with a surplus.
ATA should use this surplus to lower the price of monthly passes (as
well as increasing service). This
combination of fare increases and lower fares speeds up bus performance in two
ways. First, riders will be encouraged
to use passes (the fastest mode of payment).
Second, riders will not need to fumble for quarters, so even one-time
riders will have a faster (if more expensive) commute. In addition, cheaper passes may create
ridership increases at least partially offsetting what ATA has lost due to its
base fare increase.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County
Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.
California Grid Runs on 100% Renewable Energy for Over 9 Hours
The state’s energy grid was entirely powered by clean energy for some portion of the day on 37 out of the last 45 days.
New Forecasting Tool Aims to Reduce Heat-Related Deaths
Two federal agencies launched a new, easy-to-use, color-coded heat warning system that combines meteorological and medical risk factors.
AI Traffic Management Comes to Dallas-Fort Worth
Several Texas cities are using an AI-powered platform called NoTraffic to help manage traffic signals to increase safety and improve traffic flow.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.