Public Trees: Landscaping, or Food Source?
An art group called Fallen Fruit promotes the idea of public fruit trees for general consumption by all. But on a trip to Madrid to plant trees, the government refused their intervention, saying that trees were architecture for the city, not food.
Alissa Walker writes, "The trio-Austin Young, Matias Viegener, and David Burns, above-was invited to participate in a large-scale urban intervention that included the planting of 60 public fruit trees. But on the day before the trees were supposed to be distributed in the mostly working-class neighborhood, they received a message from the city that they hadn't expected to hear: No."
Published on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 in
- Why was BART's Ridership Forecast for Millbrae Station So Wildly Off-Base?
- A City With Room for Everyone
- Comparing the World's Urban Tree Canopies
- Desert 5, Humans 0
- An Investigation of Affordable Housing Failure on the Atlanta Beltline
- Report Predicts the End of Individual Car Ownership
- Friday Friendly: More Houses Should Have Patios in the Front
- The Secrets of 'Place Making' Success
- Road Funding By Taxes, Tolls, and Fees, Broken Down by State
- San Diego Activists Plan a Pedestrian Promenade and 'Nudillo'
- No Self-Driving Cars Without Hyper-Local Maps
- Planning for Water Scarcity in Colorado
- Coffee With Your Gentrification?
- Oregon Bike Tax Attracts Interest of Influential Colorado State Senator
- Here Today, Gone Tomorrow, Here the Day After That
- How Planners Can Liberate the Next Amazon
- Buying American Is Making Infrastructure More Expensive, Study Finds
- Lawrence Halprin and the Public Realm: Can the United Nations Plaza Unite San Franciscans?
- Permits for Single-Family Homes in Texas Once Again Outnumber Multifamily Permits
- London Releases Tunnels Map for Claustrophobic Tube Riders
