Can Thorium Save Us?
Thorium is much cleaner, more efficient and safe than uranium, and doesn't leave any waste that can be weaponized. Could a thorium-based nuclear power industry save the U.S.?
Richard Martin has a lengthy feature in Wired that clearly presents the case for thorium.
"It's abundant - the US has at least 175,000 tons of the stuff - and doesn't require costly processing. It is also extraordinarily efficient as a nuclear fuel. As it decays in a reactor core, its byproducts produce more neutrons per collision than conventional fuel. The more neutrons per collision, the more energy generated, the less total fuel consumed, and the less radioactive nastiness left behind."
Published on Monday, January 4, 2010 in
Topics
- Why was BART's Ridership Forecast for Millbrae Station So Wildly Off-Base?
- A City With Room for Everyone
- Comparing the World's Urban Tree Canopies
- The Roots of Racial Transition
- Desert 5, Humans 0
- An Investigation of Affordable Housing Failure on the Atlanta Beltline
- Report Predicts the End of Individual Car Ownership
- Friday Friendly: More Houses Should Have Patios in the Front
- The Secrets of 'Place Making' Success
- Road Funding By Taxes, Tolls, and Fees, Broken Down by State
- No Self-Driving Cars Without Hyper-Local Maps
- Planning for Water Scarcity in Colorado
- Coffee With Your Gentrification?
- Oregon Bike Tax Attracts Interest of Influential Colorado State Senator
- Here Today, Gone Tomorrow, Here the Day After That
- How Planners Can Liberate the Next Amazon
- Buying American Is Making Infrastructure More Expensive, Study Finds
- Lawrence Halprin and the Public Realm: Can the United Nations Plaza Unite San Franciscans?
- Permits for Single-Family Homes in Texas Once Again Outnumber Multifamily Permits
- London Releases Tunnels Map for Claustrophobic Tube Riders
