Cul-de-Sacs, R.I.P.?
New regulations in Virginia limiting their use may be the death knell for cul-de-sacs. Planners and developers debate their worth, but new studies show they aren't cost effective for cities, or even as safe as assumed.
Michael Cannell writes, "Planners say the circular, meandering cul-de-sac layout requires circuitous drives to even the closest locations John Michlig, who writes a suburban planning blog called Sprawled Out, says that it takes city crews six times as long to performance cleaning and other services in his Wisconsin suburb as it would in a grid neighborhood."
Published on Wednesday, December 30, 2009 in
Topics
- Poll: Who Are the Most Influential Urbanists?
- Housing Construction in Seattle and Vancouver a Study in Contrasts
- Friday Eye Candy: An Infographic for Every Transit Mode
- Why Replace Successful BRT With Rail?
- Search the Location of the Nearest Confederate Monument
- Cooling L.A.
- The Archaeology of Public Memory and Civic Identity
- Is the Era of the 'Free' Freeway Coming to an End?
- What Will Become of London's Transit Megaproject After Brexit?
- Gentrification and Controversy in the Bronx
- Southern California City Halts All Mixed-Use Construction
- Underwater Parking Garages: Why Not, Boston?
- Recommended Listening: Podcasts for Designers and Planners
- Congestion Pricing Could Be Fairer Than the Status Quo
- Metrorail Travel Patterns Revealed
- Free Falling: Productivity of U.S. Construction Industry Half of 1960s Level
- California to Consider 12 New Water Storage Facilities
- Praise for Gov. Andrew Cuomo from New York Times on Cordon Pricing
- Cracking Found in Frame of Philadelphia's Comcast Technology Center Tower
- U.S. DOT Brings Maryland Purple Line Back From the Dead
