Will Too Much Public Input Create 'The Big Ugly'?

Can soliciting too much public input on civic decisions result in nothing getting done? Seattle's efforts to figure out what to do with the Alaskan Way Viaduct provides a "textbook" example.

1 minute read

March 7, 2007, 2:00 PM PST

By Abhijeet Chavan @http://twitter.com/legalaidtech

"[Seattle's] 2.2-mile-long Alaskan Way Viaduct [is an] aging, earthquake-vulnerable elevated expressway that separates much of downtown Seattle from Elliott Bay, one of the city's iconic natural features...One [proposal] would replace the viaduct with a tunnel. It would be a visionary reclamation of Seattle's somewhat neglected waterfront, according to proponents, and a Boston Big Dig-style construction nightmare, according to opponents. The other measure would replace the viaduct with a new elevated expressway...In a way, the saga of the neglected roadway is a textbook example of what many call the 'Seattle process,' or the reputed civic inclination here to seek so much public input and listen to so many sides of an argument that nothing actually gets done."

Read the full story: Seattle's 'Big Ugly' political mess

Monday, March 5, 2007 in The Los Angeles Times

Transportation Washington

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

Start Learning

Advertise with us

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.