New research suggests that cooling pavement treatments can actually make pedestrians standing on it feel hotter.
A popular new tool for cooling urban streets and sidewalks could have some unintended consequences, reports Linda Poon in Bloomberg CityLab. According to Poon’s article, “recent research in Phoenix has resurfaced a glaring tradeoff: The reflective coating can make pedestrians standing on the treated pavement feel even hotter.”
“When [professor V. Kelly Turner] and researchers at Arizona State University looked at the impacts of the first US program in Los Angeles, they found that around noon on a hot, dry day, a person standing on cool pavement could feel more than 7 degrees warmer than if they were to stand on uncoated asphalt. The mean radiant temperature, which is a measure of how humans experience the heat, fell in the afternoon but was still 3 degrees warmer.”
Those findings were reaffirmed by an Arizona State University study. However, Poon notes that “ASU’s study suggested minimal difference in mean radiant temperatures between sidewalks near traditional asphalt streets and those near reflective pavement,” meaning pedestrians walking on surfaces near coated streets but not directly on coated surfaces wouldn’t be affected.
For Turner, this points to a need to prioritize shade trees, a proven solution to urban heat, before trying more experimental solutions. But cooling pavement treatments have their place. By dramatically reducing surface temperatures, cool pavements can prevent burn injuries. “Perhaps a more pronounced effect of cool pavement technology that further appeals to cities is that it decreases thermal strain on the pavement, reducing cracking and helping extend its lifespan.” And one pavement treatment used in the Pacoima neighborhood of Los Angeles is showing promising results, with early research indicating that the treatment cools ambient temperature and doesn’t create glare in the same way as others.
Until more data on cool pavement coatings is available, experts believe cities should “carefully consider where to apply [them], and weigh both the costs and benefits alongside other interventions.”
Read the full story: The Hottest Urban Heat Solution Comes With a Glaring Tradeoff
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
How a Chicago-sized wind farm beat the odds and powered on
The project spanned five presidential administrations and a standoff with a U.S. military base.
MTA gives itself 30 days to transform pit into basketball court
The site has been under construction since 2022; the city originally estimated it would finish the court in 2024.
Non-stop party: Chicago voters weigh permanent festival grounds
A stable place for bleachers, stages and drainage may streamline the setup and teardown of large events.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority