Stockholm's local government says no to new residences because noise levels outside are too high, according to the government.
English Translation: of "Noise stops new residences in city."On Tuesday the government said 'no' to new residences on Oxtorgsgatan (Ox Market Street) in central Stockholm. Noise levels outside are too high according to the government.The decision risks halting all residential construction in the city, according to the city building department."It is both unfortunate and disconcerting. It makes it all the harder for us to facilitate new residences in the central city, despite this being a quarter where it is really needed," says Ingela Lind, Building Director in Stockholm.Almost a year ago, the county administrative board put an end to plans for the Stuten block, a plan that would have made it possible to renovate office buildings to residences. The project had been included as part of a renewal of the eastern part of town adjacent to the areas near Regeringsgatan (Government street), Kungsgatan (King Street) and Oxtorgsgatan. The goal was to make an otherwise monotonous area of offices livelier by providing additional living space. But the administrative board said no, citing noise levels above 55 decibels out on the street as their reasoning. This threshold was earlier established by the Parliament. This value is actually surpassed on many streets in Stockholm and its inner suburbs.Common practice has developed allowing exceptions when the dwelling units are built with a quite side. However, the exception was not allowed in this case.According to Ingela Lind, this decision influences all inner city projects such as Västra Kungsholmen (West Kings Island), Hjorthagen (Deerfield), Norra Bantorget (North Ban Square) and Hammarby sjöstad (Hammarby village-by-the-sea). In order to create a quiet side, the development must be built in a block or square. This creates difficulty for small apartments and several of the highly cost effective point house projects in process in the city."It goes without saying that we are worried. In other arenas, the government has said that we need to build more and build inexpensively, and yet they make this type of decision. It makes buildings more costly and small apartment construction more difficult," says Ingela Lind."This is a separate matter. This type of building is seen as unhealthful for those who will live there, but it doesnt mean that it is setting a precedent," said Ivar Frostenson of the Department of the Environment. This point of view is not shared by the National Board of Housing who, in concert with yesterdays decision by the government has also been given the task of investigating how the noise threshold will be interpreted when new residences are planned."This question is a hot topic and we have been waiting on a decision from the government. It is viewed as somewhat setting a precedent. If the government had said yes to the plan, it would have likely been followed by a large number of applications for building permits in similar areas of Stockholm, according to Dick Larsson of the National Board of Housing who stood behind the county boards vote against the plan and who was a member of a referral board on the matter."When we made our decision, we didn't feel that there was enough justification in the evidence to accept residences here," he said.Where there would have been 20-30 new units, now stands an empty concrete skeleton. The old offices have been razed and the construction has awaited a decision from the government. Even the property owner, Drott, has regretted the decision, even though it is significantly more profitable for them to build offices. "We have been expecting to build residences here. From a clearly technical standpoint, it would not have been a problem to build quiet apartments here and it would have given more life and excitement to the East City," said Peter Wågström of Drott."Now we will have offices instead. We can't indefinitely sit on an empty building in central Stockholm for long," he added.Article by Annika Nilsson, [email protected]. Thanks to Carl Morgan for the translation.
Thanks to Carl Morgan
FULL STORY: Noise stops new residences in city

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

Op-Ed: Why Mobility Is Political
The freedom to move remains unevenly distributed between people of different backgrounds.

Bringing Community Voices Into Renewable Energy Planning
The MIT Renewable Energy Clinic helps coastal communities navigate the complexities of offshore wind development through neutral, inclusive engagement that surfaces local concerns and supports fair decision-making.

Creating Ocean-Safe Plastic from Seashells
USC researchers have created a biodegradable, marine-safe plastic alternative using calcium carbonate from seashells, offering a promising solution to ocean pollution.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions