The Thoreau Institute offers a defense of strip developments, comparing planners' attempts to remove them as similar to the urban renewal programs of the 1950s.
Urban planners consider strip developments to be ugly and auto dependent, so they want to prevent such developments from being built and modify existing ones to discourage driving. Yet planners' schemes for strip developments are anti-consumer, as they will lead to less consumer choice and higher prices.The Theoreau Institute presents a 4,000-word report about strip developments. Among the points in the report: (1) Strip developments are the natural result of people's desire to live apart from the noise and traffic of busy travel corridors combined with the desire of businesses to locate along such corridors. (2) Highways that turn into strips serve two functions -- transporting people across the region and giving local residents access to goods and services -- with minimal interference between these functions. (3) Strip developments offer an incredible variety of goods and services, many of which are not found in shopping malls, city centers, or other, more heavily planned areas. (4) Proposals to limit or modify strip developments are anti-consumer as well as anti-business.
Thanks to Laura Kranz
Read the full story: http://ti.org/vaupdate42.html
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Northwest rail fans eager for Sept. 30 debut of Amtrak’s Airo fleet
Get ready for that new train smell and more seats. But they won’t go faster or run more frequently on the Cascades route in Washington and Oregon.
Record-breaking wildlife overpass in Colorado brings 91% reduction in animal collisions
Prior to the overpass, vehicles were hitting one deer per day on Colorado’s Interstate 25.
Detroit to transform waterfront with $2.2 billion investment
Developers will convert about 18 acres of unused parking lot space into civic spaces.
‘Going backwards:’ Baltimore mayor, students rally against state's transit funding plan
Maryland's proposed six-year plan provides no funding for Baltimore’s BMORE bus program and reduces its road maintenance funding.
Trump wants to cancel nearly 98% of funding for HUD housing support program
Multiple housing groups are suing the administration in an effort to preserve the funding.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Thousand Oaks
City of Wisconsin Rapids
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello