Toronto Sprawl Costing Taxpayers Billions
Report finds long-term costs of sprawl outweigh short-term benefits.
"If sprawl - the vast sections of low-rise housing and strip malls replacing farm fields - continues for the next 25 years, [Greater Toronto Area] taxpayers will have to pay billions more than if more compact communities were built, the report says." The report recommends adopting Smart Growth strategies.
Thanks to Geoffrey Singer
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, July 29, 2003 in
Topics
- Recycling Is Cancelled
- Study: Density Can Impede Growth
- Seattle Gives Final Approval to 27 Upzones
- 'Urban Luxury' Housing Skyrockets in Texas and Beyond
- The Case for Fourplexes in Portland
- Chinese Cities Build Big Despite Shedding Residents
- Pop Quiz: Can You Identify Cities By Density Alone?
- Scrutiny for HUD Secretary Ben Carson's Schedule
- Santa Monica Pedestrian Mall Wants People to Hang Out
- Where a Freeway Plan Failed, a Development Opportunity Rises
- Suburbs Still Have an Advantage Over Cities, Study Shows
- Main Street as a Microcosm of the World
- Transportation Impact Fee Finally on the Table in Seattle
- 'Renter-First Housing Policy' Adopted by the Minneapolis City Council
- Environmental Impact Bond to Fund Atlanta Watershed Projects
- Vital Lessons From the Midwest Bomb Cyclone and Flooding of 2019
- Bipartisan Support for Federal Diesel Emissions Reduction Bill
- Washington State Needs Funding to Address Culvert Issue
- Jeep Plant Isn't Getting a Warm Reception From Detroit Residents
- The Cuyahoga River Once Caught Fire, Now its Fish Are Safe to Eat
