A highly anticipated light rail project is quickly diminishing in scope as costs soar.
Almost four years after Austin residents voted to increase city property taxes to fund a $7.1 billion light rail proposal, the project has been whittled down to just 10 miles of projected rail at a cost of $8.2 billion. Land acquisition costs nearly quadrupled as Austin land values rose rapidly and more properties along the line were needed than previously thought.
According to reporting by Joshua Fechter in The Texas Tribune, "The new plan no longer reaches Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and the number of stops was cut from 26 to 15." The per-mile cost has risen to three times more than the 2020 estimate, Fechter adds.
In 2024, some residents sued the city, saying that the project is no longer what they voted for. Another lawsuit will decide whether the city can use property taxes to fund transit at all. The project has also received none of the federal funding it was relying on.
According to Fechter, "Officials and transit advocates say that even the smaller light rail plan is necessary to give people more options to move around the state’s fourth-largest urban area as it grows." Austin Transit Partnership intends to break ground on the project next year.
Read the full story: Bigger price tag, smaller footprint: How Austin’s Project Connect went off the rails
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority