Proponents of a new Accessory Dwelling Unit rule in Seattle say the tactics of opponents backfired with this Environmental Impact Study.
Dan Bertolet reports from Seattle, where the city recently released a highly anticipated Environmental Impact Study (EIS) on a proposed rule change that would allow for more construction of Accessory Dwelling Units in Seattle's residential neighborhoods.
According to Bertolet, the study was provoked by an appeal by anti-development activists led by Marty Kaplan. Bertolet provides a scathing critique of Kaplan's obstructionist positions in an earlier post from April 2017.
Now the environmental study responds to the appeal, and Bertolet says it reveals the appeal as "bunk": "baseless claims eviscerated by analysis and evidence." As an example, see here Bertolet's analysis of concerns about displacement:
The appeal’s most grievous complaint was that making it easier to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs) would lead to displacement in lower-income communities of color. In other words, poor people would lose homes to rich speculators.
The appeal’s most grievous complaint was that making it easier to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs) would lead to displacement in lower-income communities of color. In other words, poor people would lose homes to rich speculators. As the appeal’s de-facto leader, Marty Kaplan, warned: “There would be a feeding frenzy for anybody with a truck and a nail bag to go buy homes and convert them into three rental units and displace the population.”
Math begs to differ. The EIS finds that relaxing ADU rules would lead to fewer teardowns of existing single-family houses—which would decrease the likelihood of renter displacement—and that teardowns are less likely in lower-priced neighborhoods to begin with. It also demonstrates that in Seattle the value of selling a house, with or without ADUs, eclipses the value derived from renting. So much for any rental conversion “feeding frenzy.”
Bertolet also analyzes the study's findings regarding parking, before pointing a finger at the enabler for the study's delay: the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A lot more analysis of the study follows. If you're looking for more, there's also another article along the same lines written earlier in the week by Erica Barnett.
Read the full story: SEATTLE’S NEW ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ON ACCESSORY DWELLINGS OBLITERATES OBSTRUCTIONISTS’ CLAIMS
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority