The Shanghai Statement creating the Global Planning Education Association Network (GPEAN) was signed by ten planning school associations at the closing ceremony of the 1st World Planning Schools Congress at Tongji University, 20 years ago this week.

In July 2001, four planning school associations representing urban and regional planning schools on four continents convened the first World Planning Schools Congress in Shanghai. In all, 650 scholars from over 250 schools in more than 60 countries met for five days to exchange research results, teaching experiences, and ideas about the future of the urban planning profession. Leaders of the four associations, Asian Planning Schools Association (APSA), Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP), Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP), and Australia and New Zealand Association of Planning Schools (ANZAPS), took the opportunity to convene a meeting of leaders of all the world’s planning school associations. They were joined by six other associations representing schools in Africa, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Latin America, and the francophone world, in two days of meetings discussing the potential for future cooperation.
Although the ten associations reflected wide differences in organization, activities and politico-economic contexts, they shared belief in the substantial potential for cooperation to advance planning education and scholarship. At the conclusion of the meetings, they agreed to cooperate on an ongoing basis with what became known as the Shanghai Statement:
Representatives of national and international planning education associations gathered at Tongji University in Shanghai and agreed on the goal of increasing mutual communication in order to improve the quality and visibility of planning and planning education. To achieve this, it was agreed to establish a global planning education association network and committees to plan holding the second World Planning Schools Congress and to develop an inclusive communications network. [1]
The Shanghai Statement was signed in English and Mandarin by the association delegates at the closing ceremony of the WPSC at Tongji University on 14 July 2001. A year later, nine of the associations sent representatives to an organizational meeting of the network in Volos, Greece, held in conjunction with the annual congress of AESOP. A proposed charter prepared in Volos was ratified and signed by the associations on 31 December 2002, establishing the Global Planning Education Association Network (GPEAN), today a network of 11 associations, those already named, plus the Association of African Planning Schools (AAPS), Association of Canadian University Planning Programmes (ACUPP), Latin-American Association of Schools of Urbanism and Planning (ALEUP), National Association of Urban and Regional Post-graduate and Research Programs (ANPUR, Brazil), Association for the Development of Planning Education and Research (APERAU, francophone), Association of Schools of Planning of Indonesia (ASPI), and Turkish Association of Planning Schools (TUPOB). [2]
Currently, GPEAN has an active role in discussions on teaching, research and practice of urban and regional planning on a global scale as a result of that initiative. The network's activities have included four world planning schools congresses, six edited issues of its book series, "Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning," published with Routledge [3], joint work with UN-Habitat , the International Society of City and Regional Planners, and the Global Planners Network, and in the various academic and professional activities in which its associations’ members participate. With its 11 associations, GPEAN brings together urban and regional planning schools from more than 80 countries, as can be seen in the map below. This week, GPEAN commemorates the 20th Anniversary of the Shanghai Statement, which was the cornerstone for its creation.
[1] Shanghai Statement, Tongji University, Shanghai, July 14th, 2001. https://www.gpean-planning.org/history/
[2] Bruce Stiftel and Vanessa Watson. Building global integration in planning scholarship. Pp. 1-14 in Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning, ed. by Bruce Stiftel and Vanessa Watson. Routledge: London and New York, 2004.
[3] Routledge, Taylor and Francis. https://www.routledge.com/Dialogues-in-Urban-and-Regional-Planning/book…

Planetizen’s Top Planning Books of 2023
The world is changing, and planning with it.

Chicago Red Line Extension Could Transform the South Side
The city’s transit agency is undertaking its biggest expansion ever to finally bring rail to the South Side.

More Affordable Housing for People, Less for Cars
Most jurisdictions have off-street parking requirements that increase motorists’ convenience but reduce housing affordability. It’s time to reform these policies for the sake of efficiency and fairness.

Autonomous Cars Putting Strain on Local Governments
As the industry pushes ahead in fits and starts, local officials and first responders are scrambling to develop protocols for handling driverless vehicles.

Getting Buy-in for Road Diets From Fire Departments
Proposals to narrow streets often meet resistance from emergency responders concerned about safety and access.

A ‘Black Market’ for Short-Term Rentals Grows in NYC
While many owners are listing their rentals on other websites, others are moving them back to the long-term rental market.
San Joaquin County
University of New Mexico - School of Architecture & Planning
Placer County
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
Arizona State University, Ten Across
Park City Municipal Corporation
National Capital Planning Commission
City of Santa Fe, New Mexico

Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.