Referred to as the “Venice” of New York according to the Broad Channel Historical Society, Kia Gregory writes of the efforts - considered questionable by some, to safeguard Broad Channel, a tight-knit, island community of 3,000 that "suffers flooding from the tides and heavy rain, not just from storm surges". The city is "budgeting $22 million to install bulkheads and raise streets and sidewalks by three feet".
The Broad Channel project offers a preview of the infrastructure outlays that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is envisioning as part of a new $20 billion plan to protect the city’s 520 miles of coast over the next decade from rising sea levels.
However, according to Eric A. Goldstein, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's New York City Environment, Broad Channel "may be surviving on borrowed time." More to the point, he asked, "How much sense does it make to keep reinvesting taxpayer dollars in a community that is directly in harm's way?" He suggests that rather than funding climate adaptation efforts for some communities, it may make more sense to fund relocation programs.
In fact, Mayor Bloomberg's adaptation plan notes the difficulty in safeguarding the Jamaica Bay waterfront, stating that it would be "extremely expensive, and disruptive, and in some cases nearly impossible".
Notwithstanding those concerns, improvements are slated to begin by installing bulkheads, water mains, drains, and sewers on four streets, and then raise them by three feet, using "a so-called shared-streets design, meaning cars, bicyclists and pedestrians will share the roadway".
Adding to Mr. Goldstein's reservations, only half the families on the street hardest hit by Sandy have returned.
Watch the 2:43 minute video by Stephen Farrell to get a better insight into the challenges of safeguarding Broad Channel.
