Bay Area to Study Regional VMT Fee

The Bay Area's two regional agencies approved funding a study to pursue a 9-county "vehicle-miles-traveled" fee of as much as 10-cents per mile that could involve GPS technology to fund regional transportation improvements.

Mike Rosenburg reports that the study of the regional VMT fee, approved for funding by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments on July 19, "is part of the long-term transportation and housing effort called Plan Bay Area, which also includes strategies like raising the Bay Bridge rush-hour toll from $6 to $8 and reducing the size of parking lots. The results are expected in December before the two agencies vote in April."

"The proposal is a long way from becoming reality. But under the scenario, drivers would likely have to install GPS-like trackers on their cars to tally travel in the nine-county Bay Area, from freeways to neighborhood streets, with only low-income people exempted."

The new fee "would likely need the OK from voters and the Legislature."

However, that wouldn't happen any time soon.

"A VMT charge is really an option for the future to be looked at and considered," said Randy Rentschler, spokesman for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the agency leading the effort. He said realistically the plan is so complex it might take a decade to implement if the public buys in."

Which would be just fine for Rosenberg's Bay Area News Group (pubisher of both Contra Costa Times and San Jose Mercury News), which did not pull any punches in its editorial on July 18, the day before the ABAG-MTC meeting.

"We are totally blown away by the creative audacity of Bay Area leaders proposing a per-mile tax on driving, maybe as early as next year, using -- wait for it -- a GPS-like tracker in every car to measure the distance it goes and the time of day the miles are racked up."

Perhaps they did not take Mr. Rentschler at his word in terms of the time required to formulate a VMT Fee proposal, let alone the legislative and plebiscite requirements. Or they just want to kill the idea entirely - which didn't work.

Thanks to MTC-ABAG Library

Full Story: Bay Area drivers could pay to drive each mile under tax proposal



Irvin Dawid's picture

VMT Fee is one of many "EIR Alternatives"

Information above is only what is reported by Bay Area News Group - to understand what it is that MTC actually approved means going to the #5. agenda item of the Joint Meeting of July 19: "Plan Bay Area: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Scoping Feedback and Alternatives". All I spotted on Pg. 10 was Road Pricing: "There have been many ideas proposed in the realm of road pricing; a VMT fee is included here. A VMT fee or tax would increase the cost of driving, provide funding for roads or transit, and encourage the use of alternative modess of transportation."

Too bad the "parking policies" alternative wasn't picked up by the media as well.

Irvin Dawid, Palo Alto, CA

Prepare for the AICP* Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $245

Essential Readings in Urban Planning

Planning on taking the AICP* Exam? Register for Planetizen's AICP * Exam Preparation Course to save $25.

Stay thirsty, urbanists

These sturdy water bottles are eco-friendly and perfect for urbanists on the go.
Book cover of Where Things Are from Near to Far

Where Things Are From Near to Far

This engaging children's book about planning illustrates that "every building has its place."