Tunnel Picked for Seattle Viaduct Replacement
Officials in Washington have come to a consensus on plans to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct, Seattle's damaged inner-city arterial. They've decided on a $4 billion tunnel, but the plans still need approval from the state legislature.
"Whether they can get the Legislature -- specifically, House Speaker Frank Chopp -- to endorse the most expensive option for replacing the vital Seattle arterial remains to be seen."
"The last time the viaduct battle came to a head, Chopp, D-Seattle, vigorously opposed anything but an above-ground replacement. He is credited with killing the tunnel plan the last time around."
"Since that time, he has invested energy designing and promoting an above-the-ground replacement that would have included a throughway and a shopping center -- all capped with a waterfront park."
"On Monday, Seattle Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis confirmed that a consensus had been reached to build a deep-bore tunnel, with an estimated cost of more than $4 billion."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Tunnel Wins Vote in Seattle - Aug 18, 2011
- Seattle Tunnel Contracts Signed, But Opposition Remains - Jan 09, 2011
- Seattle Tunnel Plan's Price Tag Causes Concern - Feb 11, 2009
- Seattle Freeway Replacement Plans Whittled to Two Options - Dec 15, 2008
- Secretive Seattle Freeway Replacement Plans Revealed - Sep 29, 2008



















Real Cost Of Seattle Tunnel Option
"They've decided on a $4 billion tunnel, but the plans still need approval from the state legislature."
$4 billion is the initial estimate, but what is the real cost?
Boston's Big Dig, a similar project, was estimated at $2.8 billion in 1985 (in 1982 dollars), but over $14.6 billion ($8.08 billion in 1982 dollars) was spent by 2006.
The Big Dig will have to pay an additional $7 billion in interest, bringing its total cost to $22 billion.
Charles Siegel