Tunnel Picked for Seattle Viaduct Replacement

14 January 2009 - 2:00pm

Officials in Washington have come to a consensus on plans to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct, Seattle's damaged inner-city arterial. They've decided on a $4 billion tunnel, but the plans still need approval from the state legislature.

"Whether they can get the Legislature -- specifically, House Speaker Frank Chopp -- to endorse the most expensive option for replacing the vital Seattle arterial remains to be seen."

"The last time the viaduct battle came to a head, Chopp, D-Seattle, vigorously opposed anything but an above-ground replacement. He is credited with killing the tunnel plan the last time around."

"Since that time, he has invested energy designing and promoting an above-the-ground replacement that would have included a throughway and a shopping center -- all capped with a waterfront park."

"On Monday, Seattle Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis confirmed that a consensus had been reached to build a deep-bore tunnel, with an estimated cost of more than $4 billion."

Source: The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 13, 2009

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Real Cost Of Seattle Tunnel Option

"They've decided on a $4 billion tunnel, but the plans still need approval from the state legislature."

$4 billion is the initial estimate, but what is the real cost?

Boston's Big Dig, a similar project, was estimated at $2.8 billion in 1985 (in 1982 dollars), but over $14.6 billion ($8.08 billion in 1982 dollars) was spent by 2006.

The Big Dig will have to pay an additional $7 billion in interest, bringing its total cost to $22 billion.

Charles Siegel

Bookmark and Share
In the long term, removing major urban freeways should be part of a more comprehensive approach to reduce automobile dependency by promoting public transportation and transit-oriented development.