The current process of reform of the Community Reinvestment Act is apparently being driven by 'goals inconsistent with good public policy.'
Kenneth H. Thomas, a lecturer in finance at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, offers a perspective on the debate over the renewal of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. "One of the most controversial issues in the current CRA reform process is the fate of the investment and service tests tacked on between 1993 and 1995...Banks generally supported these tests, which became optional in 1996 and mandatory in 1997, since it meant they could get Community Reinvestment Act credit -- as much as 50% of their rating -- for nonlending services. Community activists feared a weakening of the CRA's basic lending function but were more focused on other reforms that promised to improve that law.Now the tables have turned -- banks generally oppose the tests (especially the investment one) and community groups and investment-test profiteers strongly defend them. My independent review of the roughly 400 comments submitted to regulators as part of the current reform process found that much of the support for these tests is being driven by goals inconsistent with good public policy."
Thanks to KnowledgePlex
Read the full story: Investment and Service Tests Take 'Community' Out of CRA
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority