After two brief, magical years in which public transit riders were treated as equals with drivers, the federal government is once again playing favorites.
In the first half of Obama's presidency the federal government took a multipronged approach to support the growth of transit ridership, including giving the same tax benefits to public transit riders as car commuters. However, 2012 has brought back the primacy of the driver in federal tax policy.
This year public transit commuters will have to pay an additional $550 dollars in taxes due to the elimination of equal pretax dollars for drivers and public transit riders. As Sarah Laskow writes, "Right now, the government is signaling that it prefers people drive to work, despite the negative consequences of car commuting-traffic, higher carbon emissions, and parking lots that suck the life out of entire city blocks."
Potential good news is on the horizon however, Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York, and Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat from Massachusetts, are seeking to restore then commuter subsidy equality with new legislation.
Thanks to Elaine Mahoney
Read the full story: Subway Blues: Car Commuters Are Getting Bigger Tax Breaks Than Transit Riders
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority