The Unbounded Home

When you buy a house, you might think that you are in control of that house and its value.  But in reality, your house’s value depends on a wide variety of factors beyond your control, such as the perceived desirability of your neighbors, local highway and transit policies, and trends in national and regional housing markets.  Your home may be your castle in a physical sense- but its value is heavily affected by what goes on outside the residential setting. In her new book The Unbounded Home, University of Chicago law professor Lee Fennell addresses the implications of this reality and of homeowners’ attempts to reassert control over property values through restrictive covenants and zoning.

3 minute read

September 14, 2010, 7:57 AM PDT

By Michael Lewyn @mlewyn


When you buy a house, you might think that you are in
control of that house and its value.  But in reality, your house's value
depends on a wide variety of factors beyond your control, such as the
perceived desirability of your neighbors, local highway and transit
policies, and trends in national and regional housing markets.  Your
home may be your castle in a physical sense- but its value is heavily
affected by what goes on outside the residential setting.



In her new book The Unbounded Home, University of Chicago law professor
Lee Fennell addresses the implications of this reality and of
homeowners' attempts to reassert control over property values through
restrictive covenants and zoning.



Covenants are usually designed to protect property values by excluding
certain obnoxious activities.  Through covenants, homeowners contract to
give away some of their property rights in exchange for a veto power
over nearby homeowners' use of their property rights.  Zoning, by
contrast, involves municipal ordinances rather than enforceable private
contracts.



But under either system, a city or group of homeowners must either
absolutely prohibit or absolutely allow certain activities.  Fennell
points out that this approach often leads to inefficiencies- that is,
rules that create X amount of harm to one homeowner (or group of
homeowners) while creating less-than-X amount of benefit to others. 
Fennell suggests a statue of a gnome as an example.  Suppose Beasley
lives in a community that has banned yard art such as garden gnomes. 
Gnome privileges will win Beasley $600 in intangible psychic benefits,
an amount in excess of the $500 cost the gnomes will impose on the
community as a whole.    Fennell suggests that a more efficient system
would allow Beasley to install the gnome and compensate the community
for its "loss", thus resulting in a societal surplus of $100. However,
both zoning law and covenant law are not flexible enough to allow these
type of transactions.



Fennell suggests a variety of market-oriented solutions to the gnome
problem, and critiques each proposed solution. One simple option would
be to create fee schedules for rule violations; homeowners could pay for
the right to install gnomes.  But a set fee schedule might be too
inflexible, or lead to definitional problems. Fennell proposes a more
complex but possibly more equitable solution: using self-assessed
valuations to set fees.  Under this system, the homeowner would set the
value of his right to install gnomes, and the city or association would
have to either purchase his right or let him pay for the right.



At the end of the book, Fennell makes a broader attack on homeownership
as currently conceived.  She asks: if a buyer of ice cream doesn't have
to buy a stake in the company, why should the buyer of a home have to
purchase the risk of national and international housing trends?  The
current system forces homeowners to put nearly all of their capital in
one investment, thus creating economic catastrophe when house values
plummet.



As a remedy, Fennell proposes "Homeownership 2.0"- unbundling the
physical value of a home itself from the broader economic risks of the
housing market.  Ideally, investors would create financial products that
would allow a homeowner to alienate some of those risks.  For example,
an investor would sell a kind of insurance against declining property
values, promising to make up some of the difference between existing
values and a future price in exchange for an insurance premium.   Or the
investor would bet on housing price premiums, buying the right to
receive part of a house's appreciation; the homeowner would benefit by
using the money to invest in more diversified holdings.  But as Fennell
admits, there are "many [design issues] that would have to be confronted
in translating the H2.0 concept into a workable policy."   So someone else will have to do the detail work of figuring out how to make Homeownership 2.0 profitable.


Michael Lewyn

Michael Lewyn is a professor at Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, in Long Island. His scholarship can be found at http://works.bepress.com/lewyn.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Aerial view of town of Wailuku in Maui, Hawaii with mountains in background against cloudy sunset sky.

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly

Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

July 1, 2025 - Honolulu Civil Beat

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

July 2, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

White and purple sign for Slow Street in San Francisco, California with people crossing crosswalk.

San Francisco Suspends Traffic Calming Amidst Record Deaths

Citing “a challenging fiscal landscape,” the city will cease the program on the heels of 42 traffic deaths, including 24 pedestrians.

July 1, 2025 - KQED

"Altadena - Not For Sale" yard sign in front of burned down house after Eaton Fire in Altadena, California in January 2025.

Half of Post-Fire Altadena Home Sales Were to Corporations

Large investors are quietly buying up dozens of properties in Altadena, California, where a devastating wildfire destroyed more than 6,000 homes in January.

July 7 - Dwell

Dense multistory residential buildings in hilly San Francisco, California.

Opinion: What San Francisco’s Proposed ‘Family Zoning’ Could Really Mean

Mayor Lurie is using ‘family zoning’ to encourage denser development and upzoning — but could the concept actually foster community and more human-scale public spaces?

July 7 - The San Francisco Standard

Blue self-driving Ford Transit van shuttle in Jacksonville, Florida.

Jacksonville Launches First Autonomous Transit Shuttle in US

A fleet of 14 fully autonomous vehicles will serve a 3.5-mile downtown Jacksonville route with 12 stops.

July 7 - Smart Cities Dive

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.

Associate/Senior Planner

Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development

Senior Planner

Heyer Gruel & Associates PA

Write for Planetizen