Planetizen Newswire
Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Randal O'Toole vs. the Livable Communities Act
O'Toole asks why, if there is such a demand for high-density, mixed-use housing, that the government needs to subsidize it?
O'Toole says that the findings in the Senate bill "claim that people who live in compact developments drive 20 to 40 percent less than average. In fact, part of this difference is due to planners confusing 'per household driving' with 'per capita driving.' In other words, compact developments have smaller households, so there is less per household driving, but when measured on a per capita basis, the driving is about the same."
"This is all garbage," says O'Toole.
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, June 17, 2010 in
Topics
- U.S. Cities Where Homeowners Stay Put the Longest
- Analysis: Parking Won't Save Struggling Commercial Corridors
- A New Mixed-Use Superblock for Portland
- The State of Public Meetings
- Video: Urban Planning Trends to Watch in 2020
- A New Planning Director in San Francisco
- Vision Zero, Meet VMT Reductions
- Recent Studies Dig Into the Affordability Effects of Housing Developments
- Miami Has the Most to Lose From Climate Change, Study Says
- A New Transit-Oriented Downtown for New Carrollton, Maryland
- Transit-Friendly Makeover for Downtown Seattle Street
- Opinion: Climate Change Has Brought the 'Era of Extreme' to the Great Lakes
- The Leaning Tower of Dallas Is Too Good for This World
- Waterfront Toronto Greenlights Most of Sidewalk Labs' Quayside Master Plan
- Airbnb, Denver Struggle to Find Common Ground
- Refugees Learn to Survive as Pedestrians on Houston's Dangerous Streets
- A Path for California to Get to Zero Carbon...And Below
- Opinion: L.A. Parking Requirements Need Serious Revamp
- Paying for the Senate Highway Bill Would Require Additional $102 Billion
- Neighborhood Preference Splits on Partisan Lines
