A few weeks ago, I read an online comment suggesting that unnamed "planners" displayed no interest in suburbia, single-family housing or family life, and instead are only interested in improving downtown neighborhoods for single people. If by "planners" the author of this comment meant new urbanists or critics of the sprawl status quo, this claim is simply incorrect. Over the past month, I have visited half a dozen new urbanist developments in Dallas and Denver (1). All of these developments have a few things in common: all include both retail and residential uses, and all strive for walkability by providing sidewalks and narrow, gridded streets. But the developments differ in two other respects: geography and housing type.
A few weeks ago, I read an online comment suggesting that unnamed "planners" displayed no interest in suburbia, single-family housing or family life, and instead are only interested in improving downtown neighborhoods for single people. If by "planners" the author of this comment meant new urbanists or critics of the sprawl status quo, this claim is simply incorrect.
Over the past month, I have visited half a dozen new urbanist developments in Dallas and Denver (1). All of these developments have a few things in common: all include both retail and residential uses, and all strive for walkability by providing sidewalks and narrow, gridded streets. But the developments differ in two other respects: geography and housing type.
Only one of the six developments (Victory Park in Dallas) is downtown; two others (Addison Circle and Eastside Village, in the Dallas suburbs of Addison and Plano respectively) are in suburbs far from downtown, and the other three were technically within city limits but not within walking distance of downtown (West Village and Mockingbird Station in Dallas, Stapleton in Denver). Thus, it is not correct to say that new urbanism is limited to downtown, any more than it would be correct to suggest that new urbanism is limited to suburbia. Rather, new urbanist development can and does occur in a wide variety of geographical settings.
Just as new urbanist projects are not limited to high-density urban settings, they are also not limited to singles-oriented multifamily dwellings. In particular, Stapleton appeared to me to be dominated by houses with front yards. Moreover, Stapleton certainly appeared quite child-friendly: Stapleton has more playground and park space than the other developments I saw, and I saw lots of children and young parents on a neighborhood tour. In fact, some Stapleton residents went out of their way to discuss how many children lived there. (2)
Of course, you shouldn't have to look at new urbanist developments to realize that a walkable neighborhood need not be a concrete jungle. The streetcar suburbs of the 1920s were dominated by houses with front yards, just like Stapleton. And even some urban settings are as family-oriented as any suburb; the Hasidic neighborhoods of Brooklyn have larger families than most suburbs. In sum, both new and old urbanism are quite capable of accommodating families.
(1) I realize that not everyone agrees what constitutes new urbanism; however, I assume for the purposes of this article that the neighborhoods listed at http://www.tndtownpaper.com/neighborhoods.htm pass the test.
(2) See for example these videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqui0DGmFls and
CNU Comes To Denver
In preparation for CNU 17 in Denver, the hometown paper published three op-eds on the importance of new urbanism, how it is changing development throughout the country, Denver's stellar role in it, and examples of it being put to use in the region.
The Natalist Case For Sprawl (And Why It Fails)
Some commentators defend anti-urban government policies such as exclusionary zoning on the basis that homeowning suburbanites have high birth rates. But this doesn't seem to be true in recent decades.
How Urban Design Can Benefit Parents and Kids
Designing thoughtful, child-friendly public spaces can ease the burdens of modern parenting and offer safe spaces for children to learn self-reliance and resilience.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.
Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.
Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.
MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.
Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie
