On the bus this morning I was handed a survey asking me to detail my satisfaction with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's public transit system. As a daily bus commuter, I was more than happy to spend my two cents, but I'm a bit skeptical that those two cents will really do anything.
On the bus this morning I was handed a survey asking me to detail my satisfaction with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's public transit system. As a daily bus commuter, I was more than happy to spend my two cents, but I'm a bit skeptical that those two cents will really do anything.
The survey included 29 questions, mostly of the "Yes or No" variety. They asked about things like the relative safety of the bus, its timeliness, its quality, the courtesy of the driver, and other general questions about my personal preferences for and opinions of the system and its service.
There wasn't anything especially groundbreaking about this survey, and though it could have gone into much greater depth, it covered the basic topic areas you'd expect in a service evaluation. For a very simple survey, I think it could reveal some overall trends in the system, most significantly along the lines of timeliness and safety.
One area not covered was ease of use. I'm pretty used to the system, but I think it is incredibly unwelcoming to new or unexperienced riders. In this blog post at Next American City, I get into detail about shortcomings in the system's signage, mapping, and accessibility to new users.
To its credit, the survey did include one question I was very happy to see: "Did you have a car available to make THIS trip?" I said yes, and I'm really curious to see how many other people did, too.
Most of the people the surveyor asked to take the survey obviously speak English as a second or third language. Many of the people I witnessed on my this two-mile leg of my commute, however, were comfortable enough with the language to politely decline to fill out the survey.
About half of the 30-40 riders on my trip filled out the survey, which was printed in both English and Spanish.
The survey collector (who was nicely clad in a bright orange reflector vest) said his independent firm would be surveying riders on every one of the MTA's bus and rail lines. With almost 200 lines throughout the county, they've got plenty of work to do.
I think it's a good idea for transit agencies to try to get this kind of information directly from the people they serve. It should be interesting to see how riders respond to this satisfaction survey, and even more interesting to see what the MTA actually does as a result. But with thousands of paper-and-pencil surveys, and a notoriously politicized and slow-moving planning process, it may be a while before the satisfaction of riders has any justification to increase.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Malls are becoming the midtowns of the future
Mall and office park redevelopments are a generational opportunity to create new nodes of urbanity.
NYC breaks ground on anti-flooding infrastructure project
New York City's new system will reduce stormwater flows to local sewers by 90%.
One Kentucky town’s secret to affordable housing
The Smoketown Community Land Trust has already built seven affordable homes for community members.
Houston gains petal-shaped cooling infrastructure to make streets more ‘delightful’
The city has installed the pavilions along 15 blocks in Houston.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority