Won't You Conserve? Pretty Please?

During my commute this morning, one of the segments on the piped-in TV news that repeats endlessly on the bus mentioned that the City of Long Beach, California, had decided put new water restrictions in effect due to an impending water shortage. The city is advising residents to refrain from watering their lawns and taking long showers – while urging restaurants to only serve water to diners who request it. According to the Los Angeles Times story on the new restrictions, residents and businesses who don’t heed the call to conserve will receive a warning from officials, while repeat offenders may face a fine.

2 minute read

September 14, 2007, 10:02 AM PDT

By Christian Madera @cpmadera


During my commute this morning, one of the segments on the piped-in TV news that repeats endlessly on the bus mentioned that the City of Long Beach, California, had decided put new water restrictions in effect due to an impending water shortage. The city is advising residents to refrain from watering their lawns and taking long showers – while urging restaurants to only serve water to diners who request it. According to the Los Angeles Times story on the new restrictions, residents and businesses who don't heed the call to conserve will receive a warning from officials, while repeat offenders may face a fine.

Now, water woes are nothing new for Southern California. This semi-arid region was never designed to be home to tens of millions of people – particularly Americans, who rank first in the world in per capita water consumption. A severe drought, combined with new rules about how much water Southern California is allowed siphon off from other parts of the state, have lead to this latest water crisis, and restrictions from other jurisdictions are apparently just around the corner.

But honestly, the whole thing got me thinking how silly it is to ask people to conserve for conservation's sake. Sure, there are lots of good people among us who will follow the recommendations to use less. But, if we are prepared to fine people who don't go along with the call to conserve, why not just simply raise the price of water itself? Basic economics tells us that when faced with higher prices, people will naturally find ways to cutback. In my mind, it might be more effective to link people's consumption (or over consumption) more closely to their pocketbook, rather than to just hope the water police can track down those profligate water users and give them a fine.

To make sure low- and fixed-income people aren't unduly punished, a two-tier pricing system could be put into effect, so that each household was allowed a base level of water use at a lower rate, and any consumption above that was priced at the higher rate.

Of course, it might be that raising water rates may involve some political hurdles (especially for municipal utilities), and it's easier to just ask people to conserve without giving people a more concrete reason to change their behavior. But since this is likely not the last water shortage that the region will face, it might pay to have people start paying more for the privilege of maintaining a green lawn or taking an excessively long shower.


Christian Madera

Christian Madera was managing editor of Planetizen from 2006 to 2008. He currently lives and works in Hong Kong.

Christian has written about urban planning, policy and technology issues for the Los Angeles Times, Planning Magazine, The Southern Sierran, and Next City Magazine, where he was a 2010 Urban Leaders Fellow. His past experience includes working as a community planner and the web and new media manager for the National Capital Planning Commission in Washington, DC, as well as a policy analyst for a non-profit housing developer in Los Angeles.

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

November 11, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A road in north eastern Nebraska with power lines on either side, and grassy fields.

Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity

Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.

November 6, 2026 - Grist

People walking and cycling on a street in Boston.

Study reveals best places in the U.S. for cycling, walking

New research from Streetlight Data examines bicycle and pedestrian miles per capita in the 100 largest U.S. cities by population.

November 8, 2026 - Smart Cities Dive

Mamdani speaks behind a podium in a navy suit.

DSA members accuse Mamdani of 'abandoning values' over housing redevelopment

New York City's mayor plans to replace about 2,000 units of public housing with private, mixed-income housing.

November 12 - Gothamist

Streetview of Colorado boulevard, a multi-lane road with trees on either side.

All sides of BRT debate unhappy with CDOT’s most recent move

The Colorado Department of Transportation is no longer considering center-running bus lanes for Colorado Boulevard.

November 12 - 9 News

Solar panels above a cranberry boy, with workers collecting berries.

Massachusetts bogs generate both power, and cranberries

Putting solar panels above farmland is one way Massachusetts is advancing toward its goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

November 12 - Grist

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.

Write for Planetizen