City Looses Unusual 'Taking' Case
Thirty years after urban renewal effort, jury rules that a city's condemnation threat constitutes temporary taking.
"Nearly 30 years after Roanoke's urban renewal effort took his family's land hostage for redevelopment that never happened, Walter Claytor won compensation Wednesday from the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority...The case cracked open the old wounds of urban renewal, during which the authority used the federal urban renewal program to demolish 1,600 homes, 200 businesses and 24 churches in Roanoke...The city had marked the property for redevlopment in 1972 preventing the owners from developing or selling the land, but no action was ever taken."
Thanks to Ben Tripp
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, November 17, 2005 in
Topics
- Every Parking Lot, Visualized
- Millennials Prefer Revitalized Historic Areas, Not Malls
- How Planners Can Liberate the Next Amazon
- Coffee With Your Gentrification?
- An Interactive Map of the World's Climate in 2100
- To Learn About a City, Visit Its Neighborhoods
- Friday Funny: Infrastructure Woes Cause National Case of Insomnia
- Lawrence Halprin and the Public Realm: Can the United Nations Plaza Unite San Franciscans?
- Like City, Like Stadium
- Could Baby Boomers Make Room for Millennials?
- Pittsburgh Takes Property Data Visualization to the Next Level
- Education and Nutrition Flourish Together
- How Long Will the Office of Environmental Justice Last in Trump's EPA?
- Critiquing Santa Monica's 'Grand Bargain' of a Downtown Plan
- Marine Sanctuaries Not Safe From Drilling
- Court Decision Forces Seattle to Improve Sidewalk Infrastructure
- No More Parking Minimums in Mexico City
- Philadelphia to Consider Bus System Redesign
- In a Perfect World, Maintenance Is the Coolest Trend in Infrastructure
- A Boring Lesson for Planners
