Cleveland's Housing Court
Is it good for the community? The neighborhood? The block? These are the questions that drive decisions in one city’s housing court.
In most courtrooms the system is set up to reward or punish individuals no one considers the impact of the decision on the larger community. But in Cleveland Housing Court, communities ravaged by abandoned and dilapidated buildings have the most at stake. If this court has a bias, its that it tends to support whats good for community.
Thanks to David Holtzman
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 in
- Is There a Perfect Density?
- Six States Considered Laws to Make it Legal to Run Over Protestors This Year
- Aurora Rising
- The Most Effective Way to Reduce Employee Driving
- Corridors Are the Secret to Improving Transit in Small Cities
- When Men Control the Debate About the Future of Cities
- Five Big Ideas About the Future of Transportation and Land Use in Los Angeles
- The 'Steady Decline' of Suburban America
- Trump's Infrastructure Plan Slow to Materialize Despite New Executive Order, Flow Chart
- Congestion Pricing Finds New Life in New York City
- Gentrification and Controversy in the Bronx
- Trafalgar Square Shows How to Reuse Pedestals Where Statues Once Stood
- Copenhagen's Post-Industrial Adaptive Reuse
- The Trump Administration's Assault on Diversity Spreads to Housing Vouchers
- Night Mayors Come to America
- Friday Eye Candy: An Infographic for Every Transit Mode
- Is the Era of the 'Free' Freeway Coming to an End?
- A Montana College Town's Beer Economy
- High-Speed Rail Takes Steps Forward in Houston, Though Challenges Remain
- L.A. County Pilot Project Will Pay Homeowners to Add Granny Flats
