Are Megastores More Important Than Housing?
The CSM argues that the high court can't let cities and states take someone's land simply to avoid raising taxes.
"If you own a residence on land that could be generating more property-tax revenue for your local government, watch out. The Supreme Court will decide this term whether government can take anyone's private property and give it to a private developer who promises to generate more money from the land."
Thanks to Laura Kranz
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, October 28, 2004 in
- Recycling Is Cancelled
- Seattle Gives Final Approval to 27 Upzones
- The Case for Fourplexes in Portland
- Pop Quiz: Can You Identify Cities By Density Alone?
- Chinese Cities Build Big Despite Shedding Residents
- Santa Monica Pedestrian Mall Wants People to Hang Out
- Scrutiny for HUD Secretary Ben Carson's Schedule
- Where a Freeway Plan Failed, a Development Opportunity Rises
- Reducing Motor Vehicle Traffic in Cities
- Jeep Plant Isn't Getting a Warm Reception From Detroit Residents
- When Traffic Solutions Cause Travel Delays
- The Many Ongoing Public Transportation Projects of the Bay Area
- On-Demand Shuttle Pilot Operating in Los Angeles
- Obama Presidential Center Still Facing Controversies
- Congress Intends to Ban Chinese Rail Cars
- Study: Housing Crisis Stems from Inequality (Not Zoning)
- Phoenix City Council Shifts Voter-Approved Light Rail Project Funding to Roads
- New Additions Coming to the Detroit Skyline
- Asking for Forgiveness
- The Fascinating Transformation of Suburban Architecture
