The Economy Of Smart Growth
Continuing the sprawl vs. smart growth debate, Todd Littman of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute responds to The Heritage Foundation's recent study that argues lower-density development, or sprawl, is less costly than smart growth.
Littman estimates the savings that can be realized via more compact development within existing urban boundaries and critiques Cox and Utt's analysis, suggesting that their report misrepresents smart growth. He notes that "most current development charges, utility fees and taxes fail to accurately reflect these location-related cost differences, representing a subsidy of sprawl. [PDF, 15 pages, 154 kb]
Thanks to Deborah Myerson
Full Story:
Published on Friday, July 9, 2004 in
Topics
- Report: No City or State in the U.S. Has Enough Housing for Low-Income Residents
- Review: The Hudson Yards Mega-Development, Open to the Public Today
- Proposed Mega-Development Would Expand Chicago's Skyline
- 3D Printing Affordable Housing at Scale
- Home Builders Aren't Building the Smaller Homes the Market Wants
- Study: Density Can Impede Growth
- It Takes a Fatality to Remove On-Street Parking
- 'Urban Luxury' Housing Skyrockets in Texas and Beyond
- Many Norms, Few Plans: Urban Rubble Clearance in the Cities of the Global South
- Concrete’s Contribution to the Rise and Decline of Civilization
- 2018 Survey: Housing Production is Up Around the U.S.
- Transit Ridership Up in San Diego
- Dallas DOT Brings New Mobility Vision to the Region
- More States Look to Expand Tenant Protections
- Santa Monica Pedestrian Mall Wants People to Hang Out
- The Case for Fourplexes in Portland
- Survey Reveals the Market Footprint of Online Grocery Services
- New Approach for the Housing Authority of New Orleans Apparent in 600 New Units
- Scrutiny of HUD Secretary Ben Carson's Schedule
- Zoning Reform Gets Another Try as Massachusetts Wrestles With Housing Crunch
