The Folly Of Fortified Development
Levees, money, power - and hope of a federal bailout when the worst happens. Just another day of planning in California.
"Since 1986, various government agencies have spent more than $180 million on fortified levees, drainage systems and other defenses for an area that now houses nearly 60,000 people. But as Natomas grows and engineers learn more about the capricious nature of floods in this wide, deep basin, many are questioning the wisdom of this fortress mentality."
Thanks to Christopher D. Brown AICP
Full Story:
Published on Monday, March 29, 2004 in
Topics
- Infographic: Space Allocation by Population in 15 U.S. Cities
- Denver Freeway Expansion Makes a Bad Situation Worse
- A Tipping Point in the Geography of the Creative Class?
- What Made It Possible for Oregon to End Single-Family Zoning?
- Master-Planned Cities in the Spotlight
- Op-Ed: Lakewood's Growth Cap Is 'Climate Arson'
- SUVs Kill Pedestrians—and They Have for a Long Time
- Research: Transit Times Determine Social Networks
- Report: Lack of Apartments Contributes to the Housing Affordability Crisis
- No Quick Fixes for L.A.’s Transit Ridership Woes
- Uncertain Future of Portland’s Neighborhood Associations Causing Controversy
- As Extreme Weather Becomes More Common, Dams Become More Vulnerable
- The Argument Against Home Ownership
- French 'EcoTax' Targets Air Travel to Benefit Rail Network
- Sidewalk Labs' Quayside Plans Get First Public Hearing in Toronto
- Wave of New Apartment Building in Sydney Means Relief for Renters
- Does the Plan to Revitalize a D.C. Canal Too Much Resemble the High Line?
- Parking Minimums Not Required in a Larger Section of Houston
- 'Vision Zero 2.0' Launched When Vision Zero 1.0 Didn't Save Any Lives
- Low-Income Housing Tax Credits Lose Luster in the Post-GOP Tax Reform World
