Close to two-thirds of the region’s municipalities missed the October 15 deadline to revise their housing elements, jeopardizing state funds and control over local development.
The saga of California’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) continues, with nearly two-thirds of Southern California’s cities and counties failing to meet the deadline for updating their housing elements to satisfy state housing mandates.
As Jeff Collins reports for the Orange County Register, “As a result, the remaining 124 governments have two hurdles to overcome to get into compliance with state housing laws and avoid a host of possible sanctions,” namely getting a new housing element approved and rezoning enough parcels to meet their housing goals. “Governments without an approved housing plan and completed rezoning can lose access to state housing and transportation grants, have less control over future developments and face the risk of lawsuits and fines.” The Southern California city of Santa Monica saw 4,000 housing units proposed when it fell out of compliance with the state law earlier this year.
The RHNA requires cities and counties to revise their housing elements every eight years to account for population growth and ensure that housing supply meets demand. Formerly seen as rather toothless, the process garnered more attention this year when the state rejected many municipalities’ housing elements as unrealistic or insufficient and gave them an October 15 deadline for revising them.
As Collins explains, “The housing plans, which can run into hundreds of pages, outline where and how new housing can be built, creating an inventory of sites where developers can build new homes. Once the housing element is adopted, governments must rezone land to ensure there’s enough land for the new affordable and market-rate housing.”
Collins notes that “On the positive side, the 73 jurisdictions that won state approval represent 65% of the 1.3 million new housing units the state wants Southern California to build by 2030.” However, the needed housing in the jurisdictions without approved plans amounts to 474,210 new homes by 2030. Meanwhile, developers can use the “builder’s remedy” to get projects approved more easily in cities without approved housing elements.
Read the full story: Most Southern California cities miss new deadline to complete housing plans
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority