'Censored' EPA Report: What Really Happened

Iain Murray says the White House was justified in editing parts of an EPA report because the global warming studies were "discredited" and "junk science."

1 minute read

July 7, 2003, 6:00 AM PDT

By Abhijeet Chavan @http://twitter.com/legalaidtech

"The 1999 study that was deleted is junk science at its worst...It is interesting that of all the funding agencies that contributed to the new study, the [New York] Times noted only the American Petroleum Institute, which provided the small amount of funding necessary to finish and publish the study...The administration should state clearly that tackling junk science is not censoring science, but championing it."

Thanks to Abhijeet Chavan

FULL STORY: Tackling junk science

Wednesday, July 2, 2003 in The Washington Times

Architecture United States

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Start Learning

Advertise with us

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.