'Censored' EPA Report: What Really Happened

Iain Murray says the White House was justified in editing parts of an EPA report because the global warming studies were "discredited" and "junk science."
July 7, 2003, 6am PDT | Abhijeet Chavan | @legalaidtech
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

"The 1999 study that was deleted is junk science at its worst...It is interesting that of all the funding agencies that contributed to the new study, the [New York] Times noted only the American Petroleum Institute, which provided the small amount of funding necessary to finish and publish the study...The administration should state clearly that tackling junk science is not censoring science, but championing it."

Thanks to Abhijeet Chavan

Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, July 2, 2003 in The Washington Times
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email