Samuel Staley
Sam Staley is Associate Director of the DeVoe L. Moore Center at Florida State University in Tallahassee.
Contributed 43 posts
Sam Staley is Associate Director of the DeVoe L. Moore Center at Florida State University in Tallahassee where he also teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in urban and real estate economics, regulations, economic development, and urban planning. He is also a senior research fellow at Reason Foundation. Prior to joining Florida State, he was Robert W. Galvin Fellow at Reason Foundation and helped establish its urban policy program in 1997.
Five Observations from Three Years in China
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"> <span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman">I’ve spent much of the last </span><a href="http://reason.org/news/show/china-mobility-project"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman">three years working on transportation finance and planning issues in China</span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman">, and Reason Foundation now has transportation policy projects up and running in the cities of Chongqing, Xi’an, and Beijing.
The Use and Abuse of Multipliers
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"> <a href="http://www.planning.org/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small">Planning</span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small"> magazine recently (December 2009) published a story on the benefits of economic impact studies for planners. Most professional planners have run across them at one point or another: they are used to evaluate economic impact and the effectives of various types of programs on job creation. Unfortunately, the article did little to also illuminate the pitfalls and weaknesses of these studies.</span> </p>
Conventional Planning May Be Contributing to Cleveland's Decline
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"> <a href="http://www.reason.tv/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800080; font-size: small">Reason.tv</span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small"> has launched a multipart series of videos </span><a href="http://www.reason.tv/video/show/reason-saves-cleveland-with-dr"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800080; font-size: small">on how the city of Cleveland can turn itself around</span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small"> using free-market approaches and limited government reforms.
The End of Sprawl As We Know It...NOT
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"> <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small">As the housing market collapsed and gasoline prices spiked in 2007, many planners may have read Cornell University law professor Eduardo Penalver’s essay in the </span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small">Washington Post</span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small"> with more than a little satisfaction.
Thinking Through the Right Transportation in the Right Place at the Right Time
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"> <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small">In an earlier post, </span><a href="/node/42367"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #800080; font-size: small">I discussed the difference between mobility, accessibility, and transportation technology</span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small">. In today’s post, I want to discuss what I think is the next step in this taxonomy in terms of the implications for the built environment and urban planning. More specifically, we need to move beyond the idea that certain transportation technologies—whether it is a car, a bus, a train, or our feet—are substitutes.