The number of single households has grown three-fold since the 1950s. More sustainable and more likely to live in cities than married households, singles experience a major problem: metro areas are not planned for them but for nuclear families.
Eric Jaffe, with assistance from Devajyoti Deka of the Alan M. Voorhees Transport Centre at Rutgers University, writes about "people living alone", who he dubs "solos" (not to be confused with the transportation version: solo drivers or commuters) or singletons. According to Deka, "when it comes to housing and travel preferences, solos tend to live more sustainable lifestyles", with sustainability measured in terms of:
- Rented apartments over detached single-family-homes
- Commuting shorter distances
- Using public transit more often
One reason for the urban preference for solos is that they make more money and have more employment flexibility in cities.
But here's the paradox: "modern metro areas were largely planned and designed with the nuclear family in mind," says Jaffe. Today 28% of all households are solos. If cities want to attract solos, Deka has two recommendations:
- "Promote and enhance public transportation"
- Recognize that "contrary to much popular belief, there are twice as many elderly solos (above 65) than young ones (18 to 34)." [Perhaps that's why "solos" is used rather than the younger-sounding "singles"]. Housing choices are key: Single-occupancy-studio rentals can play a vital role
Dr. Deka's paper, "The Living, Moving and Travel Behaviour of the Growing American Solo: Implications for Cities", was published July 05 in Urban Studies. The abstract is available free, while the text requires a subscription to Urban Studies.
Readers may recall that the growing numbers of singletons was the topic of NYU sociology professor Eric Kleinberg's 2012 book, "Going Solo"; four articles on it can be accessed below under "Related".
Read the full story: The Rise of People Living Alone Has Led to More Sustainable Cities
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority