Turns out if you don't provide the parking, tenants still bring their cars - they just park on the street, according to a limited Portland survey. Neighbors asked city planners for a moratorium on 'parking-less' apartments and adding parking minimums
Elliot Njus writes on the controversy surrounding new apartments built or proposed without parking in Portland. While "the no-minimum-parking requirement (has) been in place in parts of the city since the 1980s, (it) has expanded since to include all commercial zones and areas within 500 feet of frequent public transit service. "
"At least two dozen apartment complexes, ranging in size from 15 units to more than 80, (were) proposed or built recently without off-street parking."
"Parking has become a uniting issue for upset neighbors", writes Njus. Consequently, a two-hour forum on Nov. 13 was convened by the Portland Planning and Sustainability Commission to allow neighbors to air their grievances about such apartment buildings. They asked for both a moratorium on such buildings, and a return to minimum, off-street parking requirements that are common throughout most of the U.S, with notable exceptions in some dense, transit and service-rich urban areas like Manhattan.
The neighbor's concerns are borne by "a city-commissioned survey of eight recent developments -- four with parking and four without -- (that) found most residents owned cars regardless of whether their building provided parking, including many who use alternative transportation for their daily commute. Two-thirds of car owners kept their cars parked on the street."
"Land-use and transportation activists, however, argued that requiring parking would make housing more expensive to build and less affordable to rent while encouraging more use of cars."
Njus writes that while "no final decisions were made at Tuesday's forum, and the commission didn't vote on any proposed policies," they "showed little support for a new minimum parking requirement." In addition, commission members "said a temporary moratorium on such projects is off the table. "
The article does not mention whether residential parking permit districts that " that reserve curb spaces for (existing) residents and their guests" were suggested as a means to discourage tenants of the parkingless building to not have cars.
Read the full story: Objections aired at forum on no-parking apartments, but parking minimum seems unlikely
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority