As L.A.'s massive downtown stadium and convention center project hurtles towards final approval, the questions regarding its design and feasibility grow to a roar.
Today, L.A.'s City Council is set to consider final approval for a plan to build an NFL stadium, and undertake renovations to the city's neighboring convention center, being pushed by developer AEG. Although approval is seemingly a fait accompli, news that a "Vision Team" of architects handpicked by Mayor Villaraigosa to evaluate the project's design delivered a stinging report that has been ignored by the city is adding to the growing uncertainties surrounding the project.
Just last week it was revealed, quite stunningly, that the company spearheading the project has put itself up for sale.
According to Dakota Smith, "[w]hile the stadium design faced some criticism from the Vision Team, the most radical suggestion was reserved for the hall," which the report concluded has major flaws.
"'This is not good city design,'
Norman Millar, president of the Burbank-based Woodbury University School
of Architecture, and one of the Vision Team members, said in an
interview this week. 'Plain and simple. It's a no-no.'"
"Seen as unrealistic because of budget constraints and the
project's fast timeline, city planning officials never presented the
recommendations to move or redesign the hall to the full Planning
Commission, which signed off on the project at its meeting two weeks
ago."
"'Villaraigosa knows this is
his legacy,' said [Vision Team member Joseph] Coriaty, expressing concern that the convention center
and the stadium 'just slam up next to each other' in the design."
"But the city is going to live with this, and it's a missed opportunity."
FULL STORY: Architects call for redesign of L.A. Convention Center hall, part of AEG NFL project
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
Colorado Bill Would Tie Transportation Funding to TOD
The proposed law would require cities to meet certain housing targets near transit or risk losing access to a key state highway fund.
Dallas Surburb Bans New Airbnbs
Plano’s city council banned all new permits for short-term rentals as concerns about their impacts on housing costs grow.
Divvy Introduces E-Bike Charging Docks
New, circular docks let e-bikes charge at stations, eliminating the need for frequent battery swaps.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
