The Irrationality Of Federal Infrastructure Spending

Charles Marohn believes that the way the US manages its infrastructure spending is problematic He finds that the lack of federal support for maintenance leads states to irrationally prioritize new projects over repairing old.

Put simply, maintenance is a local issue. Marohn cites the example of his home state of Minnesota, which has more than 1000 deficient bridges in need of significant rehabilitation or replacement. Federal infrastructure money only comes in large quantities for new construction. If Minnesota passes up on the chance to build a new bridge for $670 (while maintaining all 1,149 deficient bridges would cost $500) that money would simply go to another state.

Therefore, politicians, for whom new construction projects aid re-election campaigns, are incentivized to seek new projects at the expense of future generations who will have to foot the repair bills.

Full Story: Dig, Baby, Dig

Comments

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Insider's Guide to Careers in Urban Planning

So you want to be a planner...

Check out our behind the scenes look at 25 careers in the Urban Planning field
Starting at $14.95
Red necktie with map of Boston

Tie one on to celebrate your city

Choose from over 20 styles of neckties imprinted with detailed city or transit maps.
$44.95