The Trouble with Designing for Transit Preference

Suburban areas don't necessarily equate with car-dependence, according to some New Urbanist plans for far-out areas. But convincing residents to opt for transit can be a challenge.
August 19, 2011, 8am PDT | Nate Berg
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

This article from Scientific American looks at the concept of reducing car use in the suburbs, and cites the example of King Farm, Maryland a New Urbanist suburb that didn't want transit.

"Instead of embracing that transportation vision, however, the residents of King Farm and the Rockville City Council recently rejected the proposed transit plan-specifically, any light-rail line that would travel down the swath of green explicitly designed to host such a system.

Transit-ready development may mean nothing if local residents are not ready for public transit. And King Farm residents seem prepared to fight the State of Maryland, which bears ultimate responsibility for the decision and still wants to route any transit system through the community. The battle highlights one of the challenges facing so-called new urbanism as it attempts to steer American life away from the car, which has dominated city planning since at least the 1950s.

Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, August 17, 2011 in Scientific American
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email