Australian Province Considers Free Transit
28 April 2009 - 11:00am
The government of New South Wales is considering a plan to remove fares for public transit.
"The Government is doing extensive modelling to make ticket prices fairer for outer suburban commuters, whether or not the free transport move goes ahead."
"If public transport were to be completely free it would cost the Government about $1 billion a year."
"However, fare revenue only covers just more than a quarter of the $3.8 billion total cost of operating public transport."
"The move could save hundreds of millions in staffing costs, ticket-machine operations and abolish the trouble-plagued smartcard."
Full Story:
Free transport 'could win election'
Source:
The Daily Telegraph, April 20, 2009
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- A Mayoral Attack on Transit in Toronto? - Jan 05, 2012
- Public Transit Required for Chicago City Employees - Oct 15, 2011
- Melbourne Ranked as Most Livable City - Sep 02, 2011
- Houston Looks At Reshaping Transit - Feb 11, 2010
- Locals Apprehensively Excited About Sydney's Big Transit Plans - Mar 24, 2008
“
Maybe we should blame Thomas Jefferson. He was the godfather of the urban sprawl racket in America.
”



















Cost of collecting fares...
In an analysis for Santa Clara, CA, http://www.vta.org/inside/boards/packets/2007/10_oct/19_attachment_a.pdf
J. Benjamin explains the concept of net fare revenue.
Subtract the cost of collecting fares from the fares collected. In this case the 1/4 of costs covered by fares include several percentage points which are the cost of collecting fares. Other factors that can be called the "cost of fares" are: 1. increased marginal cost per ride due to lower ridership resulting from fares. 2. cost of enforcing fares. 3. time lost loading and unloading passengers. The main purpose of fares today is to discourage use. They are in effect a "restraint-of-trade" subsidy to the auto, oil, and sprawl companies.
http://fptcanada.blogspot.com