How Cities Compete In The Media Economy

American cities suffer from outdated infrastructure that inhibits the local economy and quality of life. Those cities that can evolve to meet the needs of the information age will be the ones to prosper immensely in the next 10-20 years.

Photo: Mike Lydon

Photo: Neil Takemoto

When surveying the American city of the past 60 years, it's been understood many times over that our nation's industrial age, mass-produced suburban infrastructure has systematically disconnected us physically and socially. This separation of live, work, and play has led to the well-documented ills of sprawl, traffic congestion, declining levels of community participation; abandoned investment in urban neighborhoods, and an increased separation between race and class. The outlook isn't expected to change as long as this outdated system is still the dominant infrastructure for city building.

However, within the last decade alone America has seen an unprecedented 'punctuated equilibrium' shift from the industrial age to the information age. The economy is evolving from an industrial one into a media-based one, with 'media' being defined as 'the main means of mass communication' (i.e. wireless high-speed internet, cell phones, and satellites.) This economic evolution requires a complementary information-age infrastructure to support it, and the governments that are first and best at accommodating this trend will eventually become the next generation of great American cities.


First of all, what constitutes a media-based economy?

An economy based on media, mass communication and services over mass-produced goods no longer requires large, centralized companies. Instead, it flourishes amid a decentralized network of small businesses and entrepreneurs. For instance, General Motors is located primarily in Detroit with factories in a few rural communities, while IBM has a presence in every major city in the country. Information-based companies are also free to locate wherever they want, and thus company leaders will locate offices in cities with the highest quality of life instead of, say, proximity to shipping routes. Also, more workers can be productive from home, whether as employees or entrepreneurs; the speed of change, flexibility and variety of an information-based economy allows unprecedented opportunity for independent contractors.

Photo
The Affinity Lab: shared workplace for entrepreneurs, above a 24-hour diner (Washington, D.C.)

As for the workforce, because they are no longer tied to a single, large company in an industrial district or even an office park, the isolation of the complementary suburbs no longer appeals to them, especially for those without kids. An emerging trend of flight from the suburbs is even more apparent given Census demographics where only one out of every ten net new households will consist of a couple with children. Cookie cutter subdivisions also do not appeal to a consumer group now firmly ingrained in a technology-enabled mass-customization mindset in the age of individualized Mini Coopers, custom-fit Levi's, and personalized M&Ms. Rather, this emerging demographic now demands a lifestyle that prioritizes connectivity and choice over isolation and homogeneity. The core of this emerging workforce can also be described as the 'creative class'; the 38 million representing science, engineering, architecture, design, education, arts, music and entertainment that economist Richard Florida's research concluded is the basis for modern economic growth.


Why is a media economy infrastructure necessary?

This decentralized network of media-based companies and entrepreneurs requires a media-based infrastructure to support it. As companies decentralize across the country, they are free to centralize in metropolitan areas to be closer to their employees, customers, and partners. The Brookings Institution recently published a study documenting such a downtown population migration based on Census trends in 44 selected cities from 1970 to 2000. Company leaders not bound by the transportation requirements of a mass production company will choose cities that offer themselves and their employees the highest quality of life. While this explains the migration of jobs to states with sunnier weather, it also shows that for northern cities to remain competitive they need to be even more focused on implementing an infrastructure conducive to a thriving media economy. Companies and individuals are also free to locate within clusters of complementary companies in the industry, such as with high tech in Silicon Valley and Austin, or fashion and advertising in Manhattan. However, one of the most significant impacts is to city centers, where basic logic holds that a company or entrepreneur will have the greatest proximity to the greatest number of workers and business opportunities, and the best of them.


What are the key components of a media economy infrastructure a city needs to compete?

An economy is based on transactions and relationships. In the media economy, these can now be enabled via virtual connections, primarily through the internet. However, the age-old belief that the internet is diminishing our need for face-to-face relationships contradicts the fact that people are moving toward rather than away from areas where more face-to-face encounters are inevitable, such as downtowns and central cities. For instance, email alone has enabled businesses to initiate hundreds of relationships with people simultaneously rather than one by one. Individual entrepreneurs and corporations are simply using the heightened ability to communicate virtually as a means of growing their business relationships, which is increasing the need for more face-to-face, physical interaction. Thus, cities need to expand their media economy infrastructure from both a virtual and a physical point of view.

Virtual infrastructure: Companies and individuals need a variety of ways to connect virtually to grow their business, and that means establishing digital networks that are fast and reliable. San Diego's government is taking the lead by offering free wi-fi throughout the entire city, even on the beach. It's no coincidence that San Diego is also one of the leaders in job growth, as fast-growth companies (gazelles) are on the forefront of innovation, and they tend to take advantage of, if not demand, likewise technological support. As mentioned, contemporary workers are no longer tied to the desk and will gravitate not only to cities, but to neighborhoods, buildings and venues where they feel the most productive. At the very least, the downtown should have a free wireless network -- which Athens, Georgia, pioneered several years ago -- as well as an extensive fiber optic network to provide the backbone for more heavy-duty digital networking.

Photo
Left: The contemporary workplace for entrepreneurs, Athens, Georgia. Right: The diversity of stores and people in the Upper Haight in San Francisco.

Physical infrastructure: This is by far the costlier, more challenging of the two, mainly because the existing infrastructure is 60 years in the making. The good news is that those last 60 years have left city downtowns relatively untouched (or in more negative terms, abandoned). Ironically, such areas are now the most appropriate for accommodating a state-of-the-art economy and quality of life. In a media economy, infrastructure in the form of a substantial interstate highway transportation network becomes unnecessary as the medium of business is now 'bytes' rather than 'atoms'. It's not that the industrial economy no longer exists; it's that it no longer dominates our economy, and thankfully no longer dominates our built environment. Here's how it applies to transportation, neighborhoods & districts, buildings and "third" places:

Transportation: Here's the bright side of the shift from industry to knowledge in our economy –- although we are losing manufacturing jobs overseas, they are being replaced by media-based jobs that do not require an intense road and highway network. Accordingly, American cities such as Milwaukee, Boston, Portland, and San Francisco have torn down inner city highways and are replacing them with mixed-use, pedestrian friendly environments that reconnect their urban fabric and create locations where the media economy thrives. Such projects assert that the fundamental purpose of transportation is to provide accessibility to real destinations, and not just mobility through them. As for cities overseas that are inheriting the manufacturing economy, many have the densities and a mass transit mindset to better avoid the traffic congestion that is inherent to our auto-dependent culture. In the digital economy, the ideal rule of transportation now applies where the quickest path between points A and B is when they are both in the same spot.

Neighborhoods & Districts: Much of this follows the now-familiar New Urbanism and Smart Growth principles of walkable, mixed-use community planning. Basically, the argument is that because there's no longer a prevailing need for an auto-based transportation network, cities that embrace the media-based economy will need to plan for pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit networks -- the New Urbanism calling card. The Department of Labor concluded that 70% of what we learn about our job comes informally, especially for knowledge-based jobs. So, as far as a productive economy is concerned, it's paramount to create a built environment that induces social interaction when not at the workplace. That means an abundance of public gathering places, dining and entertainment districts near home and work.

Buildings: Our experience with the higher standard of living brought on by suburban living has greatly increased our expectations for urban living and working. In order to attract people to the economic centers of downtown and their surrounding neighborhoods, people will have to give up their backyards and 3,000 square foot homes. To compensate, downtown buildings need spectacular daylighting and views, interiors should feel spacious (high ceilings, open floor plans, ample daylight), and communications must be state-of-the-art. Finally, public safety can be heightened with commercial on the ground floor of residential, following the 'eyes on the street' rule of thumb championed by Jane Jacobs that is now a common mantra of police departments across the country. In the knowledge economy, these ground floor venues have the potential to accommodate some of the aforementioned informal networking by the inhabitants above, which leads us to...

Third places: If you look closely, every 'cool' urban neighborhood has a "third place" -- one that is outside of the home or workplace where people of all persuasions choose to congregate for various reasons. For some it may be a certain pocket park, a neighborhood diner, a church, or even a corner store. For the purveyors of the media economy it is typically coffeehouses, bars, cafes or some combination thereof. On the TV show Ally McBeal, the lawyers discussed much of their most intimate business issues in the neighborhood pub on the ground floor of their office building. It's a representation of reality, not fiction. The same thing happens at the shared entrepreneurial work center where the Cool Town Studios office is locted, where the most ambitious business ideas get exchanged over a happy hour glass of beer or wine. Third places are the favorite, trusted destinations for social interaction outside of the home and workplace. Without them, many of the best ideas in a knowledge-based economy never see the light of day. Third places also need free wi-fi to connect people both face-to-face and virtually, like Tryst and Busboys & Poets in Washington DC, and the Flying Star Café in Albuquerque. Finally, college and graduate students flock to third places, and expect to be able to do so upon graduation. Thus, it should be no surprise that cities with vital urban neighborhoods and great third places, like Brooklyn and Austin, are attracting the 'creative class' and have positioned themselves as leaders in the media economy.

Photo
A coffeehouse-lounge-bookstore-theater 'third place' in Washington, D.C.


What can cities actively do to support a media economy-based infrastructure?

First, it's important for cities to recognize that they can't count on the private sector to plan the construction of any kind of comprehensive infrastructure. Second, it's just as critical for cities to realize that it is indeed the private sector's role to build that infrastructure, and even more so, to allow them to collectively concentrate their resources one neighborhood or district at a time rather than piecemeal throughout the city. By taking six key steps, cities can provide the infrastructure necessary for a media-based economy.

  1. Identify the best neighborhood or district for infrastructure investment. The City of Austin is investing in a plan to focus investment primarily in their downtown. The City of San Francisco is focusing much of their attention for new development in the Mission Bay district, including a new university campus. The City of Lowell, Massachusetts, recently designated a strategic 15-acre site in the downtown.

  2. Plan the neighborhood/district transportation around mass transit and pedestrian traffic. Implement appropriate zoning codes -- such as the Smart Code -- that prioritize people over cars.

  3. Designate public places to draw outside visitors, increasing the level of social interaction among the knowledge-based workforce. Remember, the productivity of such a workforce is proportional to the number and diversity of people it interacts with. Ideally, this would be a public piazza or square surrounded by independent restaurants with outdoor seating, offices above, and loft residences above those. When designed well, this can also be achieved with paseos (narrow pedestrian-only alleys) or pedestrian-only streets, which have been essential to the economic success of downtowns in the rather progressive cities of Pasadena, California, Burlington, Vermont, Boulder, Colorado, and Charlottesville, Virginia, to name just a few. While parks are an asset, they aren't nearly as effective as these hard-scaped public gathering places simply because parks aren't designed for commercial traffic.

  4. Incentivize higher-density, mixed-use building development without a debilitating demand for parking. The City of West Palm Beach identifies specific sites and blocks it wants to see developed, providing new street improvements and density bonuses. Car parking need not be a right, just a privilege. There are countless buildings in pedestrian-oriented neighborhoods of major cities that have zero parking, and those are the very areas that are witnessing the most significant rises in property value.

  5. Recognize the economic value of independent retail districts and use incentives that encourage developers to tenant them. There are numerous studies (see the Institute for Local Self-Reliance) that document the economic value of independents vs. chains. One such study noted that Maine's government would lose $23 million if chains captured all retail growth in the next four years, and another study showed that for every dollar spent, 70% more stays in the local economy with independents rather than chains. Private sector developers do not benefit from these figures, only cities do. Therefore, it is up to the municipality to incentivize the private sector into attracting independent vs. chain businesses through its economic development department. One of the most effective tools would be to provide ongoing assistance in identifying and securing independent business tenants as well as providing lease guarantees to the developers. Otherwise, the predictability, higher rents, relative ease, and simplicity of leasing to chains make an overwhelming business case for developers to favor them over independents. Highly successful independent-business main streets include those in downtown Boulder, Colorado, Burlington, Vermont, Madison, Wisconsin, Charlottesville, Virginia, and throughout Washington DC, Manhattan, Brooklyn and San Francisco.

  6. Establish a comprehensive city-wide low-cost or free wi-fi network, as pioneered in downtown San Diego, Philadelphia, Athens, Georgia, and Alexandria, Virginia.
Photo
Left: Offices, coffeehouse, restaurant, bar, lounge, diner, and lofts in Adams Morgan (Washington, D.C.) Right: Burlington, Vermont's popular pedestrian-only street, even on chilly weekday nights.


Who's Involved is Just As Important As What's Involved

Understanding the principles of the media economy and executing on the key steps to building its infrastructure will lead to economic growth for your city. However, this does not only mean merely embracing high-speed wi-fi (virtual connectivity), walkable neighborhoods (physical connectivity), and a variety of housing, transportation, shopping and entertainment choices, but actually integrating all of them in an organic way that is authentic to the eyes of the consumer. This is why so many people find cities like Seattle, San Francisco, and Manhattan so irresistibly appealing (based on their real estate values) -– and why those cities are so economically successful. If cities expect to effectively attract the creative class and its entrepreneurial job-creating leaders, then the creative class needs to be actively sought after and intrinsically included in the planning, design, development, and maintenance process.

As the shift from an industrial economy to a media-based one continues, the demand for connected, place-based communities will continue to grow and prosper. We've all but outsourced agriculture, and we've moved on. We've long been outsourcing our goods, and we're moving on. We're starting to outsource our services, and there's widespread concern. The solution is not to try to hold on to what we'll inevitably lose, but to invest into what we'll inevitably gain, which is an economy based on knowledge, innovation and ingenuity. Cities that don't invest in the infrastructure to accommodate this progression will witness a detrimental outsourcing of their jobs and job-creating population. Those that do will become the next great American cities.

Neil Takemoto is the Founding Director of CoolTown Studios. His work for over the last ten years has been clearly focused on the implementation of next-generation towns for entreprenurially creative people.

Mike Lydon is a Planetizen correspondent and a Masters Candidate at the Taubman College of Architecture & Urban Planning at the University of Michigan.

Comments

Comments

THE NEED FOR MEDIA ECONOMY PENETRATION

Hip, cutting edge cities, towns, and downtowns indeed are part of the "media economy" as this piece highlights.

The article offers thoughtful, cogent points and the pith of the argument cannot be denied.
That would be expected by something penned in part by Mr. Takemodo.

However, we continue to see the same examples cited time and again as places that are cutting edge centers-- where there are third places,smart growth, live/work space, economic gardening and other forms of entrepreneurship.

The conundrum that is set before us is how we as urban revitalization professionals translate that to something meaningful for
places that are on the other side of the "media divide" or "cool/hip/bohemian" divide(all terms from which I recoil given that if you call yourself cool and bohemian your probably aren't--Jack Kerouac had some things to say about that--but I digress).

Yes we know NYC, San Francisco, Austin,are going to be cutting edge and the university towns like Madison, Ithaca, Cambridge, Chapel Hill and countless others are going to be cutting edge--but we are lacking at this juncture,are several concrete examples where this transformation has taken place beyond places such as this. Even the places touted as "new and unexpected" examples of transformation really have been on the cusp for a while or received regional publicity for their efforts.

The International Economic Development Council did a great job identifying the marrriage of Smart Growth and economic development--but most of those place have been appearing on lists over the last year or two anyway--including Burlington, Iowa where a former Hollywood producer is leading the way there.

The intent of the authors in this well written and organized piece was of course to
create a road map for developing a media economy--and for that alone they deserve accolades. I work with cities across the country to develop entrepreneurial downtowns and I think we need to start looking at some examples beyond the "usual suspects." Yes, we know the places that have achieved success--NOW LET US STRETCH AND IDENTIFY SOME NEWER EXAMPLES.

The problem of course is that many communities that are making gains are making smaller incremental gains and cannot hold a candle to neighborhoods like Short North in Columbus or Roslindale Village in Boston. Therefore, they do not get held up as examples of progress..when indeed they have made great strides within the context of their resources. Their stories perhaps will resonate with many who are just starting a revitalization effort or are a year or so in.

I was glad to see Lowell,Mass.(Kerouac's home in fact) mentioned--a city where I started my career in urban revitalization. Those are the types of places we need to bring to the fore in order to make "real" concepts such as the "media economy."

In summary, a great piece by two talented folks. Yet there is a hunger I see across the country as I help cities establish entrepreneurial centers, for examples that are more accessible, reachable and perhaps(Gasp!)not so cool.

Charles D'Aprix(Chuck D'Aprix)
The Downtown Entrepreneurship Project/Economic Development Visions
downtownproject.com
economicvisions.com
DAPRIXBLOG.com

shiny wrapping paper

Advocacy for a "media-based economy", beyond private practice, seems akin to pulling up society by it's bootstraps.

Perhaps I misread the intended audience?

I read only an exhortation of what amenities the authors expect to make cities more desirable to a small population segment.

The authors claim that because information age technology allows an individual or individuals to decentralize, the likelihood increases that they will abandon existing urban centers for places with greater, more pleasing amenities. I believe this to be mostly inaccurate, as some of those childless couples the authors refer to will eventually want a place to raise their future children. Why settle in one place for the fancy movie theater, only to relocate for better schools for the kids in 5 years? The logistical problems posed by this outlook are usually regarded to outweigh the short-term profits, or fun.

In addition, not many fit the mobile, hallowed "38 million", for one reason or another. There may be a need for development of new urban areas; this is a given, as market forces tend to exclude interest in some areas in proportion to the interest they generate - even if it means increased density among the clusters of smaller towns near existing concentrations. Certainly, nobody wants to repeat the mistakes of isolated gate communities and developments that the larger construction companies have profited from over the past half-century.

But, in order for any political entity to survive in the future (which is as far as advocacy for any cause can extend in the form of municipal regulations), it needs to provide for a broader range of typological concerns than addressed in the above article, inasmuch as it provides for the welfare of a broader range of it's population that the mobile minority. Disenfranchisement breeds distrust.

In that vein, globally-oriented decentralization is a strong trend in many contemporary networks, that empowers some but tends also to orphan existing local workforce capital. This in turn promotes a net loss on other social systems provided by the state. The less mobile majority are the ones most directly affected by infrastructural shifts, and the ones deserving the most care by the State and concerned practitioners.

Focusing on implementation...

Thanks Charles - now those are the kind of questions I enjoy hearing. I certainly get tired of hearing about the same old cities being at the forefront, but hey, that's where they are. However, for a list of the up-and-comers, check out Bohemian Bargains, 50 Smart Places to Live (49 of which are recognized as college towns), and our Emerging Retail Report which profiles Cambridge MA, Madison WI, Athens GA, Burlington VT and Ann Arbor MI. The other thing is, just about every city now has a creative, entrepreneurial district, and I work with a $150 million equity fund that's looking to invest a minimum of $5 million per project into the developers that 'get it', and that's something that city leaders can take a lead on as far as catalyzing.

What's not 'cool' is defining what that means for other people. What is indeed 'cool' is allowing people to define it for themselves, then defining it as a community, then having developers build it for them - that's what our beta communty program is all about, and something the aforementioned investors prefer because it reduces their risk by having the tenants secured beforehand.

As far as the other comment on abandoning urban centers, the entire focus here is on investing in and inhabiting urban centers. The trend is that creative, entrepreneurial, and knowledge-based businesses are decentralizing, not cities, which are 'centralizing' and much better suited to accommodate the smaller footprints of those decentralized companies. It's also not about building communities for everyone, but focusing on the creative, entrepreneurial sectors - the risk takers - that will invest in the vision before anyone else. Once that base is there, the higher-paying jobs will follow, and that's really what the rest of the population wants. City governments are not shy about such a focus, and it's certainly a more productive one than focusing on the luxury apartments and Class A office space that other governments seem to focus on.

The bottom line is, the purpose of this article is not to talk to beget more talk, nor is it self-promotion - this is about action and real dollars begetting real change, and working with others to do the same. Charles' comments seems to be focused on that end.

Neil Takemoto, CoolTown Studios

The Usual Suspsects.......

Thanks Neil:

First, allow me to apoligize for misspelling your surname in my last post(with a last name like mine I'm particularly sensitive to that!).

I am familiar with Cool Town Studios and the concepts you advance. I applaud what you and Kennedy and others have planned. As a fellow Washington DC business--it's great to have an entity like yours in the neighborhood--particularly one so closely aligned with what we do and advocate.

I read the postings on your site regularly and read Bohemian Bargains before I wrote my earlier response. There are certain cities that appear regularly not only on your site but other Smart Growth/New Urbanist sites, and I still hold--even with the "up and coming" bohemiam communites--these communities have been known to those in urban revitalization for some time as cutting-edge places or places getting ready to break that way. That's not a criticism per se, just the way it is--as you point out.

I would posit that the real challenge is to get the "media economy" into cities that don't have "cool" entrepreneurial sections. You and I would disagree I think in your position that almost every city has a cool section(again I recoil from the use of cool--but so be it, that's my problem).

While I work with many cities that indeed do have emerging commercial dsitricts with appeal to certain demographics (and lifestyle components)there remain many cities/towns/regions that are economically viable, yet lack the entrepreneurial, new economy "cool" component you are advancing.

That said, creative class proponents such as us need to find those existing examples while we are creating new ones. Too often I hear(I'm paraphrasing)" Yeah sure that works in Boston, or Chapel Hill, or Berkeley, Burlington,or Madison, but we just don't have that ability here..we are too dispersed etc etc...

I applaud your work, but I think we need to advance new examples sooner rather than later.
Recent case studies might be instructive. Taking the reader from non-cool neighborhood to cool neighborhood in linear narrative format would be great(or non-media economy to media economy). In fact that would be a compelling story for you to advance--and I know many of us would enjoy reading it. Keep up the good work.

Charles D'Aprix(Chuck D'Aprix)
The Downtown Entrepreneurship Project/Economic Development Visions
downtownproject.com
economicvisions.com
DAPRIXBLOG.com

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Featuring thought-provoking commentary and insights from some of the leading thinkers and practitioners in the field.
$18.95
DVD Cover of The Story of Sprawl

The Story of Sprawl

See how America changed shape in this collection of historic films that visually document how sprawl evolved.
$29.99 for 2-DVD SET