A bill filed in early February would prohibit local governments in North Carolina from regulating the appearance of single family homes and duplexes.

Under North Carolina House Bill 36 and Senate Bill 25, design regulations would no longer apply to single family homes and duplexes without consent from neighborhood groups and property owners. The proposal includes some exceptions related to structural safety, historic preservation, and flood insurance programs, but the proposal is otherwise far-reaching, to be applied locally across a range of land uses, permitting classifications and zone districts.
In commercial districts (not included in the proposal), design regulations help ensure the form, appearance, and scale of new development is consistent with desired community character. In residential settings, design regulations help encourage variation, for example to discourage cookie-cutter development patterns in new subdivisions. The proposal is a backlash to more stringent design regulations used in some municipalities, which some feel are excessive.
The residential design standards legislation was introduced alongside another measure which would limit local government powers. House Bill 51 would end the use of extra-jurisdictional control. This refers to land use authority extending to areas just beyond city borders. In many instances these controls help facilitate transition from urban to rural character, for example in stepping-down density allowances. And if city services and infrastructure extend beyond city boundaries, it can make more sense for the municipality to administer local land use regulations. Some feel however, that because affected property owners cannot exercise voting power in the controlling jurisdiction, the practice is unwarranted.
All three proposals passed their first readings and have been referred to local government committees for further review.
FULL STORY: Cities, towns fight NC legislation that would limit their authority

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)