The policies that create affordable housing for the middle class might not be those necessary to prevent homelessness for the destitute.

How many times have you read this argument?
Liberal: "We need more government spending to create affordable housing for the poor."
Conservative: "If we just had less government intervention, our city would be affordable, just like Houston or dozens of other cities- and then we wouldn't need government subsidies."
It seems to me that both sides are right—but that both sides are addressing entirely different problems.
Here in New York where I live, affordable housing is not just a problem for the very poor who are forced into homeless shelters—it is also a problem for middle (and even upper middle) class people who are forced into suburbia by skyrocketing rents. It seems to me that government subsidies are unlikely to solve the latter problem, because in an already highly-taxed city or state, the public would probably not tolerate the level of taxation required to make housing affordable for the majority of the city's population.
A better remedy is to allow more private sector housing construction. If the city's overall housing supply sufficiently increased, rents would eventually go down or at least stop rising, and the city would be more affordable for the middle class, just like our nation's relatively inexpensive inland cities.
But even if New York's rents declined to the level of Houston or Kansas City, there would still be homeless people. In fact: even Houston has thousands of homeless people, for the simple reason that even cheaper-than-average rents may be too expensive for people who are utterly destitute and/or incapable of taking care of themselves. These people will need public housing or significant government subsidies to be housed.
In sum, the issue of "affordable housing" is two separate and very different problems—housing for the middle class and housing for the poor. It seems to me that the remedies for one problem will not work for the other.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.

Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.

MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.

Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie
