Obtaining Letters of Reference for Graduate School in Planning

<p> <span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">I’ve had a lot of students ask me recently about who should write a letter of reference as they apply to graduate school. I have a policy on my own web site stating when I will <a href="http://www.annforsyth.net/forstudents.html#ReferenceLetters" target="_blank">write a letter</a> but there are more general principles that hold across many faculty members and programs.</span></span></span><span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small"> </span></span> </p>

March 27, 2011, 4:34 AM PDT

By Ann Forsyth

I've had a lot of students ask me recently about who should write a letter of reference as they apply to graduate school. I have a policy on my own web site stating when I will write a letter but there are more general principles that hold across many faculty members and programs. 

Try to get someone who has graduated with the same type of degree as the one you wish to study. Having two engineers or two architects recommend you for planning can backfire as they may not have a clear understanding of the field. If you need to have people from outside the field, prepare them to say why they think you would be a good planner. If you are applying to a PhD make sure most of your letter writers have that degree and anyone who doesn't should be there for a very good reason.  

Ask people who know you well enough to be specific in their letters. On my web site I state my need for multiple interactions. Something like this is really a general principle. Without such interactions letter writers must resort to generalities. General or vague letters may, however, suggest that the applicant has problems that the reference writer does not want to talk about. I just can't write a good letter unless I know an applicant well so I am not doing them a good service if I attempt it. 

Obtaining letters from people who are personally recognizable to other professors can be useful, but it is much more useful to have a letter from someone who knows you well. If a famous person will provide only a few general sentences, it is typically not worth getting that letter. 

However, all letters should come from people who have attained some position of responsibility. Not every letter needs to be from a very senior person but as you balance the two or three letters you typically are allowed to submit, try to get someone who has employed or taught a large number of people so they can provide thoughtful comparisons and a sophisticated assessment of your capacity for graduate school. You might have one letter from someone more junior if they were, for example, your direct supervisor and can provide very specific details about very relevant activities.  

If you are an undergraduate, make sure you actively cultivate letter writers. Sometimes undergraduates do a lot of big classes and feel they don't know faculty. This is all the more reason to work before going back to graduate school. You can, however, also be more strategic in selecting classes, so some professors do get to know you better. Try to do some classes with permanent faculty who are likely to stay around a while, and see writing letters of reference as part of their job, rather than part-time faculty who may be hard to locate and unwilling to write. Sign up for office hours and ask advice about graduate work. Make sure these faculty members can talk about you with some familiarity. 

If you have been out working for a very long time be strategic. If professors have written for you in the past, they may be able to update that letter. However if that is really ancient history, try to get letters from people who can speak to your aptitude for learning new things, writing, reading, and working in teams. Sometimes you may interact with permanent or adjunct faculty members in a professional context-it may be appropriate to ask them. Overall, make sure your academic aptitude is clear.

If the language of instruction of the degree is not your first language, then a letter from someone fluent in that language and attesting to your skills can sometimes help. One of your main letters might come from someone fluent in your proposed study language and if so it is helpful if they comment on your language abilities. If not, and particularly if your test scores in that language are not stellar, having a short letter from a professional in the field who is fluent in your study language can be useful. This is not essential however, and if you are only allowed two letters in my opinion they should focus on your professional potential. 

If the country of your first degree is not the same as the one where you propose to do graduate work, try to get at least one letter from someone who understands the system in the country where you will study. It helps admissions committees when letter writers refer to their experience studying or visiting abroad, their specific understanding of the strengths of the program you wish to study in, and provide their assessment of how you will fit. You may need to help your letter writers with this preparation.  

Again, remember to thank those who write letters for you as they have done a lot of work. 

Previously I have written about a number of aspects of graduate applications. For links to relevant entries see: http://www.annforsyth.net/forstudents.html#Advice 

Ann Forsyth

Trained in planning and architecture, Ann Forsyth is a professor of urban planning at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. From 2007-2012 she was a professor of city and regional planning at Cornell.

Chicago Transit Authority Green Line Train at 35th-Bronzeville-IIT

A New Transit Equity Dashboard

New data technology has made it possible to measure transit equity in ways that were impossible before. TransitCenter is making good use of the new capabilities.

June 17 - TransitCenter

Car-Centric Planning

Mapping Environmental Justice Hotspots

A new map of Virginia illustrates the stark contrasts in pollution burdens depending on location.

June 18 - The Virginia Mercury

California Gas Statin

The Big Taboo of the Senate's Bipartisan Infrastructure Proposal

Ten bipartisan senators have proposed a nearly $1 trillion infrastructure deal with no new taxes, but it does include indexing the current gas tax of 18.4 cents per gallon, unchanged in 28 years, to inflation, thus potentially increasing gas prices.

June 17 - The Washington Post

New Updates on The Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

New Case Study Posted on HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Hand Drawing Master Plans

This course aims to provide an introduction into Urban Design Sketching focused on how to hand draw master plans using a mix of colored markers.