Growth in Footprint Far Exceeded Growth in People
A new study shows that while development in the North Carolina mountains increased 568 percent between 1976 and 2006, the population only increased 48 percent. What happened?
Mary Newsom has the story:
"This means the development grew even more thinly spread around the area than it was in 1976. The average number of developed acres per person, known as the "development footprint" went from 0.06 in 1976 to 0.30 in 2006."
"I know unemployment in the N.C. mountains has been a severe problem. My concern is that the form of development, not the fact of the development, is destroying a precious natural treasure."
Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, August 25, 2010 in
Topics
- Generative Codes Yield Better Plans
- Measuring the Effect of Zoning on Housing Prices
- Criticism of a Gas Station Proposed for the Philadelphia Waterfront
- 'The Future of Transportation Is Not About Inventions. It’s About Choices.'
- New Local Celebrity: Sinkhole Bus
- The Onion Satirizes New York's Fare Enforcement Techniques, Over Spending on Transit
- A Long-Range Transportation Plan for Ohio
- The Importance of Urban Tree Canopies
- Election 2019: Planning and Development Related Results Roundup
- Living in the Gentrified Version of Fort Greene, Brooklyn
- Minneapolis Officially Ends Single-Family Zoning; Change to Take Effect January 1
- Report: Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning Sparked Growth
- Amtrak Continues Positive Gains in Revenue, Ridership
- What Would Cities Look Like if They Were Designed by Women?
- 'Rose Lane Project' Proposed to Prioritize Bus Improvements in Portland
- Tinkering With New Ride-Hailing Area Produces Results at LAX
- Pedestrian-Only 'Gaslamp Promenade' Considered in San Diego
- Political Deal Clears the Way for Waterfront Development in Cincinnati
- Walkable Neighborhoods Set the Stage for Upward Mobility, Study Says
- Urban Planning, Explained
