The Essence of the Planning Debate: Architects vs. Economists

Should urban planners take their cues from architects who prefer central control or economists who prefer free markets?

1 minute read

June 4, 2007, 1:00 PM PDT

By Christian Madera @http://www.twitter.com/cpmadera

Economists know that free markets are essential at regional and larger-scales. Architects know that central planning is critical at the building-scale. "Putting a bunch of construction materials and people on a site and letting the 'free market' construct a building without a plan or coordination is clearly not going to work very well." What's the right approach for the middle-scales from streetscapes to neighborhoods to cities to metros?

Thanks to Tory Gattis

Read the full story: Architects vs. Economists

Sunday, March 18, 2007 in Houston Strategies

Urban Development Texas

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

Start Learning

Advertise with us

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.