So Did Smart Growth Make Portland Unaffordable?

Randal O'Toole pushes back against Philip Langdon's article that questions whether Portland's growth boundary made the city less affordable.

1 minute read

March 15, 2005, 11:00 AM PST

By Chris Steins @planetizen


In the March 2005 issue of New Urban News, New Urbanist Philip Langdon argues that the city's urban growth boundary did not make Portland unaffordable.

Randall O'Toole offers a rebuttal to Langdon's article: "[Langdon] reveals that the National Association of Home Builders had used erroneous data in its housing affordability index. Since smart-growth skeptics such as Wendell Cox and me relied on that faulty index to conclude that Portland experienced the fastest decline in affordability of any U.S. housing market in the 1990s, Langdon triumphantly announces we must be wrong.

...[But] the best data available clearly show that Portland suffered the greatest decline in housing affordability of any urban area in the 1990s.

...Yes, Portland's urban-growth boundary, along with other smart-growth policies, did reduce Portland's housing affordability. Yes, Portland's affordability declined in the 1990s by more than any other urban area. Yes, urban-growth boundaries or other smart-growth policies appear strongly correlated with reductions in affordability in other urban areas as well."

Thanks to Chris Steins

Monday, March 14, 2005 in The Thoreau Institute

Young Professional

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

September 16, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

Geese flock to a frozen pond in Aurora, Colorado. There are houses in the background.

Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing

The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.

September 17, 2026 - Capital & Main

The Hoover Dam blocking the Colorado River. The river's water level is noticeably low. The cliffs surrounding the blue water are brown and jagged.

US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico

A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.

September 11, 2026 - The Arizona Republic

The Gross Reservoir, a large body of water surrounded by trees and mountains.

Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion

Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.

September 18 - Inside Climate News

Passengers board an Amtrak train under a cloudy sky.

Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement

The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.

September 18 - Mass Transit

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh delivers remarks at his swearing-in ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects

The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.

September 18 - Construction Dive