Los Altos Hills wants to alter its housing element to limit proposed new housing, a move that could run afoul of state law.
A small Bay Area town is at the center of a heated battle over housing density in California, reports Ben Christopher in The Mercury News.
In January 2023, Los Altos Hills, which historically only allowed single-family homes on one-acre lots, voted to allow some apartment buildings within town limits. After residents opposed a proposed development that includes affordable units, the town council voted to reduce the number of units in the proposed project by two-thirds, arguing that the density of the original project would increase local traffic, pose a threat to wildlife, and impede emergency access.
Twin Oaks was originally slated to have 598 units, a number that was later cut to 334 single-family modular homes. The town’s updated housing element would only permit 92 units, which Los Altos Hills officials argue is the “realistic capacity” of the area. “Town officials and many local residents say the proposed changes to the municipal land-use blueprint, known as a housing element, still meet the letter of the state’s planning requirements while capping would-be development at a scale better suited to the town’s rural character and consistent with the intent of the original plan.”
Since the town approved its housing element two years ago, three sites were identified for potential development. One is the Twin Oaks site, and “ the other two sites identified as possible multifamily developments — campuses of the Saint Nicholas Catholic School and Foothill College — never looked especially promising.” The Diocese of San José, which owns the sites, has no plans of selling or developing them.
How state officials decide to respond to the city's changes could have significant impacts in other California communities.
FULL STORY: Why this wealthy South Bay suburb is at the center of the next big fight over California housing
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Mamdani overhauls NYC's Vision Zero plan with 100 new policy goals
The overhaul aims to reduce traffic deaths and make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers through lower speed limits, new safety infrastructure and more.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association