'Mixed Use' Is Mixing Up A Florida County
The Halls River Retreat developer is reviving his 54-unit proposal for a mixed-use development, based on Citrus County's land development code that allows mixed use -- something no longer allowed in the County's Comprehensive Plan.
The problem boils down to this: mixed use allows developers to do things that the Citrus County comprehensive plan does not. Mixed use became a part of the land development code in 1990; in 1997, it was taken out of the county's comprehensive plan. When Circuit Judge Jack Springstead overruled the County Commission's February 2002 approval of the Halls River Retreat development, he said the comprehensive plan must trump all other considerations.
Thanks to Sheryl Stolzenberg
Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, June 18, 2003 in
- The Year in Skyscraper Construction
- A Compelling Case for Protected Bike Lanes
- Is Pay by Distance Unfair to the Poor?
- Understanding the 'Dark Store Theory' Costing Local Governments Millions in Property Tax
- Rising Homelessness, Erroneous Data: Rethinking Utah's 'Housing First' Policy
- Let's Hope Trump Considers Infrastructure a National Security Issue Too
- A Better Travel Experience
- Mall of America Gets Opportunity Zone Status
- CA Gov.: Cities Must Meet Housing Goals or State Will Withhold Gas Tax Funds
- Congestion Pricing Takes Major Step Forward in New York City
- Defense Department Calls Climate Change a National Security Threat
- Inland Waterways Looking for a Comeback
- The 'Latino Homeless Paradox'
- Seattle Rebrands its Planned Bus Rapid Transit System: Stride
- How Do Downtown Homes Prices Compare?
- New Taxi Fee Could Have Lethal Consequences
- Plan to Speed Up Relief Line Construction Pitched in Toronto
- Needed: A New Approach to the Colorado River
- Another Lawsuit Complicates Purple Line Plans in Maryland
- Bill Would Make California's Urban State HIghways Safer for Non-Motorists
