Think you can tell the difference between regular condescension and urban planning condescension? Take this quiz to find out!
Do you ever find it hard to tell the difference between ordinary condescension (a fellah patiently explaining your own area of expertise back to you) and urban-planning condescension (an urban planner of any gender — I’ve been a culprit — using a lot of jargon to explain the place where you already live)? If so, you’re not alone.
Here are some examples: Let’s say you’re waiting on a street corner, and you casually mention to the guy standing next to you, “This street is unsafe to cross.” If he replies, “It’s important to distinguish between perceived safety and the collision data,” you’re talking to a plansplainer. If he starts waxing eloquent on how statistics work, you have a run-of-the-mill mansplainer on your hands (especially if you have an undergraduate degree or minored in statistics).
Or, let’s say if a fellah is explaining to a woman planner what urban planning is, that’s probably a mansplainer. But if he starts going on about density versus intensity, or modal splits, you’re dealing with a plansplainer who cares more about talking over you than talking down to you.
Still can’t tell the difference? Take this quiz and find out.
For each statement, determine whether you are being mansplained to or plansplained to.
- “Actually, the reason your phone battery drains so quickly is that you have too many apps running in the background.”
- “I like that coffee shop too. It creates good ground-floor activation.”
- “The thing about cast iron is that you really shouldn’t wash it the same way you wash other pans.”
- “I’m not saying your opinion is wrong. I’m saying you may not fully understand the policy context.”
- “What you’re describing as ‘a nice little neighborhood where you can walk to things’ is something we call a ‘complete community.’”
- “You can’t really say what wine tastes better unless you control the shape of the glass.”
- “Let me draw you a diagram on this napkin.”
- “It’ll make more sense if I show you how compound interest works.”
- “Has anyone ever explained to you the difference between gross density and net density?”
- “People think they need more parking, but what they actually need is better transportation demand management.”
- “It may look like a bench, but it’s actually functioning as public-realm infrastructure.”
- “I understand that you’ve worked in this field for thirty years. But there’s actually a fair amount of research on the subject.”
Answer key
1=M. Classic mansplainer territory.
2=P.
3=M. Extra point if you did not ask anything about cast irons.
4=Trick question. Could go either way.
5=P. Especially if the neighbourhood has only recently learned what it is called.
6=M. You were just trying to enjoy the wine.
7=Insufficient information. This could become an explanation of tire pressure, tax brackets, floor-area ratio or view corridors. Do not surrender the napkin.
8=M.
9=P.
10=P. No one knows exactly what TDM actually means, which is part of its power.
11=P. Never call a bench a bench when you can swap out for six syllables.
12=Trick question. Could be either. Do not make eye contact.
Now, take a quick look back at the original sentences, and tally up how many mansplainer and plansplainer soundbites you’ve faced in real life.
Your results
Mostly mansplainer:
You have encountered too many people who possess the rare ability to explain something with greater confidence than the person who actually knows it. Common symptoms include beginning sentences with “Actually,” commandeering napkins for diagrams and basking in one’s knowledge of cast iron.
Mostly plansplainer:
You have encountered more than your fair share of urban planners. There is no known cure, although exposure to ordinary nouns may reduce symptoms. Make sure to remind those afflicted that they need to try saying “sidewalk” instead of “pedestrian realm,” “shop” instead of “ground-floor activation” and “people walking around” instead of “pedestrian activity.”
Equal answers mansplainer and plansplainer:
Congratulations! You have attended a public meeting. Refreshments will not be provided.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
‘Going backwards:’ Baltimore mayor, students rally against state's transit funding plan
Maryland's proposed six-year plan provides no funding for Baltimore’s BMORE bus program and reduces its road maintenance funding.
Detroit to transform waterfront with $2.2 billion investment
Developers will convert about 18 acres of unused parking lot space into civic spaces.
U.S.-Iran war may have ‘devastating’ impact on cost to warm homes
Vermont and Maine residents may see a 76% increase in the cost of warming their homes this winter.
Senate bill would ‘overhaul’ environmental permitting laws
Under the proposed act, government agencies would also not be able to suspend or rescind permits after granting them.
Exemption applications for NYC’s pied-à-terre tax see 55% success rate
The city sent nearly 40% of its initial pied-à-terre tax warnings erroneously.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
One Hundred Miles
County of Mendocino
planning NEXT
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Montrose County
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority