The phrase "traffic congestion" can be misleading; some reductions in traffic speed are less harmful than others.

There has been much debate in planning circles (including Planetizen's own blogs) about how to measure traffic congestion. The most widely cited measurement, the Texas Transportation Institute's Urban Mobility Scorecard, compares automobile traffic speeds to "free flow" speeds (that is, auto speeds in the absence of significant traffic). By this definition, a road is congested if people drive 40 miles per hour on a road where they could be driving 50 miles per hour.
But not all "congestion" is equally noxious. For example, suppose people drive 20 mph on a two-lane urban street where the free-flow speed is 40 mph. In such a situation, drivers lose a few seconds here and there, but traffic might flow fairly evenly. Here, lower speeds actually benefit the public in a variety of ways. Slower speeds mean that accidents (both between cars and between cars and pedestrians) are less likely to lead to death or significant bodily injury. A pedestrian hit by a car going 40 mph has more than an 80 percent chance of death, while one hit by a car going 20 mph has about a 5 percent chance of death. Similarly, streets designed to accommodate slower traffic tend to be less dangerous for drivers, because it is more dangerous, other things being equal, for a car to be hit by a fast-moving object than by a slow-moving object. Moreover, drivers are only slightly inconvenienced by slower speeds where the lower-speed street is part of an urban grid; in such places, the congestion is easy to avoid, because a driver can easily switch to another street.
By contrast, imagine the stereotypical traffic jam: bumper-to-bumper traffic on an interstate highway. This form of congestion is more irritating to drivers for two reasons. First, drivers have no alternative route, and thus feel more helpless. Second, "stop and go" traffic is less predictable than slow, even traffic; if I am stuck on I-75 going 5 mph, I have no idea when I will reach my destination. Finally, highway congestion lacks the public benefit caused by "congestion" on a traditional street: since there are generally no pedestrians on interstate highways, slow speeds on such highways do nothing to protect pedestrians. Even on an arterial street with sidewalks, a traffic jam creates only small safety benefits because traffic can rapidly go from 5 mph to 50 mph and back again.
In sum, stop-and-go interstate highway congestion is the worst form of congestion, low speeds on an urban grid actually create public benefits. So to measure congestion appropriately, we should focus on the former.
A postscript: other than criticizing how congestion is measured, does any of this have any practical application for government policymakers? It seems to me that my ideas cut against the common idea that "congestion" justifies turning neighborhood streets into speedways.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.

Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.

MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.

Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie
