Are the signs of peak driving, i.e., peak vehicle miles traveled (VMT), here to stay or is it just an aberration and the metric will begin increasing, i.e., it is a 'lagging indicator'?
Fortune's Chris Matthews cites five reasons given by "Behind the Numbers" (sorry, subscription only, but Matthews kindly lists them) that explain why driving hasn't increased as have most metrics, e.g. gross domestic product, since the Great Recession ended. He admits to being surprised that it "has been stagnant for almost seven years" (see graph):
The only other time in history that we've seen a similarly long time between the peak and trough was following the 1982 recession, in which it took 39 months for total vehicle miles traveled to recover to its previous peak. It’s now been more than twice that amount of time since we reached the all-time high in vehicle miles driven, and unlike the case in the 1980s, we don’t have the excuse of a recent gas-tax hike to blame for it.
"So, what is going on here?" asks Matthew incredulously. "In a note to clients (August 14), independent research firm Behind the Numbers argued that we’re entering a new era in which Americans simply prefer to drive less." They write:
It’s unlikely that miles driven is a lagging indicator that will eventually return to its prior trend. There is ample evidence that a 60-year trend of increased per capita driving has ended…. Among the reasons a sharp reversal is unlikely:
However, Matthews proceeds to dispel some of these reasons, and concludes by writing, "There’s plenty of reason to believe that America’s love affair with the car is beginning to cool, but it’s probably a bit early to declare this case closed."